Multimodality In Silico Imaging of Dense Breasts: A Comparative Study of Ultrasound Computed Tomography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

被引:0
|
作者
Diba, Tara [1 ]
Badal, Andreu [1 ]
机构
[1] US Food & Drug Adm FDA, CDRH, OSEL, DIDSR, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2024: ULTRASONIC IMAGING AND TOMOGRAPHY | 2024年 / 12932卷
关键词
Multimodality Imaging; Ultrasound Computed Tomography; Digital Breast Tomosynthesis; POWER-LAW ABSORPTION; PROPAGATION; CANCER; SIMULATIONS; TEXTURE;
D O I
10.1117/12.3009493
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to develop a software tool to simulate ultrasound computed tomography (USCT) scans of a realistic anthropomorphic breast phantom. The tool was incorporated in an existing simulation framework for x-ray based imaging, resulting in a multimodality in silico evaluation framework. Methods: Digital breast models were developed utilizing advanced mathematical modeling based on procedural generation techniques to closely mimic the complex structural and compositional heterogeneity observed in human breast tissue. The breast's acoustic properties, including the speed of sound, density, and acoustic attenuation, were stochastically incorporated into the phantom in preparation for USCT simulation. Full waveform inversion was employed to reconstruct the ultrasound images. Results: We were able to image a dense breast model with multiple modalities in silico. In addition to USCT simulation with the newly developed software, digital breast tomosynthesis, mammography, and computed tomography images of the same phantom were simulated using the GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo transport software MC-GPU. Conclusion: The presented in silico methods can be used to compare the performance of imaging technologies based on completely different physical characteristics, such as x-ray attenuation or ultrasound speed of sound. In silico evaluation has the advantage of enabling task-based evaluation in a fixed anatomy with known disease ground-truth, and without exposure of patients to ionizing radiation. With the required level of verification and validation, this framework could enhance our understanding of the performance of USCT as a standalone modality or as an adjunct to x-ray modalities, potentially providing in silico evidence that could be leveraged in regulatory evaluation of new USCT devices.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screening for Dense Breasts: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Destounis, Stamatia V.
    Morgan, Renee
    Arieno, Andrea
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 204 (02) : 261 - 264
  • [2] Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography
    Lee, Won Kyung
    Chung, Jin
    Cha, Eun-Suk
    Lee, Jee Eun
    Kim, Jeoung Hyun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (01) : 291 - 296
  • [3] Reducing Unnecessary Biopsies Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Ultrasound in Dense and Nondense Breasts
    Hadadi, Ibrahim
    Clarke, Jillian
    Rae, William
    McEntee, Mark
    Vincent, Wendy
    Ekpo, Ernest
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (08) : 5508 - 5516
  • [4] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Ultrasound Versus Digital Mammography Plus Ultrasound for Screening Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts
    Ha, Su Min
    Yi, Ann
    Yim, Dahae
    Jang, Myoung-jin
    Kwon, Bo Ra
    Shin, Sung Ui
    Lee, Eun Jae
    Lee, Soo Hyun
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Chang, Jung Min
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 24 (04) : 274 - 283
  • [5] Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for screening women with dense breasts
    Houssami, Nehmat
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2016, 13 (06) : 515 - 517
  • [6] Diagnostic Efficacy across Dense and Non-Dense Breasts during Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Ultrasound Assessment for Recalled Women
    Hadadi, Ibrahim
    Clarke, Jillian
    Rae, William
    McEntee, Mark
    Vincent, Wendy
    Ekpo, Ernest
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [7] Breast cancer detection: Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis across non-dense and dense breasts
    Hadadi, I.
    Rae, W.
    Clarke, J.
    McEntee, M.
    Ekpo, E.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2021, 27 (04) : 1027 - 1032
  • [8] Dataset of patient-derived digital breast phantoms for in silico studies in breast computed tomography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography
    Sarno, Antonio
    Mettivier, Giovanni
    di Franco, Francesca
    Varallo, Antonio
    Bliznakova, Kristina
    Hernandez, Andrew M.
    Boone, John M.
    Russo, Paolo
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (05) : 2682 - 2693
  • [9] Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Dibble, Elizabeth H.
    Singer, Tisha M.
    Jimoh, Nneka
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (06) : 1397 - 1402
  • [10] Impact of angular range of digital breast tomosynthesis on mass detection in dense breasts
    Scaduto, David A.
    Huang, Hailiang
    Liu, Chunling
    Rinaldi, Kim
    Hebecker, Axel
    Mertelmeier, Thomas
    Vogt, Sebastian
    Fisher, Paul
    Zhao, Wei
    14TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING (IWBI 2018), 2018, 10718