Evaluations of medical device usability during clinical investigations: a scoping review of clinical study protocols

被引:0
作者
Douze, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Schiro, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Heyndels, Louise [2 ]
Pazart, Lionel [3 ]
Pelayo, Sylvia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, Evaluat Technol Sante & Prat Med, ULR 2694,METRICS, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Inserm, CIC IT 1403, Lille, France
[3] CHU Besancon, Ctr Invest Clin, INSERM, CIC 1431, Besancon, France
关键词
Usability; human factors; clinical investigation; clinical investigation protocol; methodology; medical device;
D O I
10.1080/17434440.2024.2378093
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
ObjectiveCombining clinical investigations with usability studies provides valuable information for medical devices evaluation. But both types of study are very different in terms of objectives and methodologies. How are usability studies integrated into clinical investigations in practice?MethodsWe searched the ClinicalTrials.gov database for clinical investigation protocols that included usability outcome(s) and analyzed them.Results77 study protocols were identified for the analysis, including 102 outcomes related to usability in total. The most frequently assessed outcomes were satisfaction (53/102) and ease of use (33/102). The questionnaire was the most frequently planned technique (85/102) followed by interviews (24/102). Other methods were used, such as observation (9/102), mostly when the end users was a healthcare professional, and diary (6/102), mostly with patients.ConclusionOur study results showed that the collection of usability data can be included in a clinical investigation, with various levels of investment. Resource-light, rapid integration via a questionnaire will enable the collection of subjective data on the users' perceptions. When more resources are available, observation in accessible environments can be set up (especially during use by healthcare professionals in hospital) or interviews and/or diaries for home-based environments (especially by patients).
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 788
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, Infusion Pumps, FDA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 820 CFR
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, Iec 62366-1
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, REGULATION (EU) 2017/745 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on medical devices
  • [5] Bogner MS., 2005, P HUM FACTORS ERGON, V49, P952, DOI [10.1177/154193120504901123, DOI 10.1177/154193120504901123]
  • [6] Why you need to include human factors in clinical and empirical studies of in vitro point of care devices? Review and future perspectives
    Borsci, Simone
    Buckle, Peter
    Hanna, George B.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2016, 13 (04) : 405 - 416
  • [7] Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety
    Carayon, Pascale
    Wetterneck, Tosha B.
    Rivera-Rodriguez, A. Joy
    Hundt, Ann Schoofs
    Hoonakker, Peter
    Holden, Richard
    Gurses, Ayse P.
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2014, 45 (01) : 14 - 25
  • [8] Chartered Institute of Ergonomics & Human Factors, 2021, ACTUAL SIMULATED USE
  • [9] What are the 'ideal' features of an adrenaline (epinephrine) auto-injector in the treatment of anaphylaxis?
    Frew, A. J.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2011, 66 (01) : 15 - 24
  • [10] Galarnyk Michael, 2019, Digit Biomark, V3, P176, DOI 10.1159/000504838