Do you cite what you tweet? Investigating the relationship between tweeting and citing research articles

被引:1
作者
Hare, Madelaine [1 ]
Krause, Geoff [1 ]
Macknight, Keith [1 ]
Bowman, Timothy D. [2 ]
Costas, Rodrigo [3 ,4 ]
Mongeon, Philippe [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Informat Sci, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Dominican Univ, Sch Informat Studies, River Forest, IL USA
[3] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies CWTS, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Stellenbosch Univ, DSI NRF Ctr Excellence Scientometr & Sci, Technol & Innovat Policy SciSTIP, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[5] Univ Quebec Montreal, Ctr Interuniv Rech Sci & Technol CIRST, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES | 2024年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
altmetrics; bibliometrics; indicators; information behavior; social media; Twitter; SOCIAL MEDIA; ALTMETRICS; CITATIONS; METRICS; PLOS;
D O I
10.1162/qss_a_00296
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The last decade of altmetrics research has demonstrated that altmetrics have a low to moderate correlation with citations, depending on the platform and the discipline, among other factors. Most past studies used academic works as their unit of analysis to determine whether the attention they received on Twitter was a good predictor of academic engagement. Our work revisits the relationship between tweets and citations where the tweet itself is the unit of analysis, and the question is to determine if, at the individual level, the act of tweeting an academic work can shed light on the likelihood of the act of citing that same work. We model this relationship by considering the research activity of the tweeter and its relationship to the tweeted work. The results show that tweeters are more likely to cite works affiliated with their same institution, works published in journals in which they also have published, and works in which they hold authorship. It finds that the older the academic age of a tweeter the less likely they are to cite what they tweet, though there is a positive relationship between citations and the number of works they have published and references they have accumulated over time.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 350
页数:19
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Adie E., 2013, Altmetric
[3]  
Archambault É, 2011, PRO INT CONF SCI INF, P66
[4]   Should You Be Tweeting? [J].
Bonetta, Laura .
CELL, 2009, 139 (03) :452-453
[5]   Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Haunschild, Robin .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (05)
[6]   Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics [J].
Bornmann, Lutz .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 103 (03) :1123-1144
[7]   Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research A case study using data from PLOS and F1000Prime [J].
Bornmann, Lutz .
ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 67 (03) :305-319
[8]   Differences in personal and professional tweets of scholars [J].
Bowman, Timothy D. .
ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 67 (03) :356-371
[9]   Large-scale identification and characterization of scholars on Twitter [J].
Costas, Rodrigo ;
Mongeon, Philippe ;
Ferreira, Marcia R. ;
van Honk, Jeroen ;
Franssen, Thomas .
QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES, 2020, 1 (02) :771-791
[10]   "Heterogeneous couplings": Operationalizing network perspectives to study science-society interactions through social media metrics [J].
Costas, Rodrigo ;
de Rijcke, Sarah ;
Marres, Noortje .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 72 (05) :595-610