Return to Play and Functional Outcomes Following Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
作者
Bak, Braydon M. [1 ]
Seow, Dexter [2 ,3 ]
Teo, Yu Ze Evan [2 ]
Hasan, Muhammed Yaser [2 ]
Pearce, Christopher J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, NUHS Tower Block,Level 11,1E Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119228, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
calcaneal tendon; intervention; management; tendoachillis; tendocalcaneus; PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; WEIGHT-BEARING MOBILIZATION; SURGICAL REPAIR; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; NONSURGICAL TREATMENT; ACCELERATED REHABILITATION; EARLY WEIGHTBEARING; SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; TENSION;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2023.12.008
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Return to play (RTP) and functional outcomes are critical to treatment success for acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR). This systematic review and meta -analysis explored treatment superiority essential in optimal treatment selection concerning individual patients and their expectations regarding RTP and functional outcomes. This study was in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta -analyses guidelines. The included studies were assessed regarding the level and quality of evidence. Fixed -effects models were employed for I (2) < 25% and random -effects models for I- 2 >= 25%. The RTP rate meta -analysis of surgical vs conservative treatment revealed no signi ficant difference. This was similar to the subgroup analysis of open repair and conservative treatment. The RTP rate and Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) meta -analysis of open repair + earlier rehabilitation (ER) vs + later rehabilitation (LR) also revealed no signi ficant differences. The mean time to RTP meta -analysis of open repair + ER vs + LR showed that open repair + ER was signi ficantly favored (-4.19 weeks; p = .002). The ATRS meta -analysis of conservative treatment with ER vs with LR revealed no signi ficant difference. This meta -analysis has revealed that the RTP rates following treatment of AATR are high. Therefore, the decision for surgical vs conservative treatment or open repair + ER vs + LR for AATR should not be selected based on the expectation of RTP. However, open repair + ER can be advocated over + LR for reduced mean time to RTP. (c) 2024 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 429
页数:10
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据