Systematic Assessment of Gambling Type Involvement: Reliability and Validity of the Gambling Disorder Identification Test (GDIT)

被引:0
|
作者
Wall, Hakan [1 ,2 ]
Wennberg, Peter [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Binde, Per [3 ]
Molander, Olof [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Ctr Psychiat Res, Norra Stationsgatan 69,Plan 7, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Reg Hlth Serv, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Univ, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Global Publ Hlth, Solna, Sweden
[5] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, Dept Psychol, Rena, Norway
关键词
Gambling type involvement; Psychometric; Assessment; Problem gambling; The gambling disorder identification test; OUTCOMES; GAMES;
D O I
10.1007/s10899-024-10345-z
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Gambling type involvement, both in terms of participation (engagement in specific gambling types) and diversity (how many gambling types an individual engages in), is a key feature to address in gambling self-report measures, but such systematic measurement procedures are scarce. The aim of this study was to test the psychometric performance of the gambling type assessment in the recently developed Gambling Disorder Identification Test (GDIT), in terms of test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and patterns of gambling diversity, among help-seeking and general population gambling samples (total n = 603). Overall, online gambling was more commonly reported as problematic than land-based gambling. Retest reliability varied for specific gambling types (ICC range 0.32-0.64, rtet range 0.66-0.85). In terms of gambling participation, online gambling showed stronger correlations with GDIT total score (i.e., symptom severity) than land-based gambling, where Slots showed the strongest correlation (r = 0.52), followed by Casino table games (r = 0.25), Sports and Horse betting (r = 0.16 and r = 0.14, respectively), and Poker (r = 0.14). Lotteries showed no correlation with GDIT total score (r=-0,01). For Slots gambling, all gambling diversity levels (including Slots as a single gambling type) were on average associated with the highest diagnostic severity level (GDIT total score > 30; severe gambling disorder). Finally, explorative configural frequency analysis identified typical and antitypical gambling diversity patterns. The result from the current study corroborates findings that engagement in specific gambling types matter, and that such features should be included in gambling measurement. We conclude that the GDIT is a reliable and valid measure for systematic assessment of gambling type involvement. The GDIT can be used to assess gambling participation and diversity, as part of a broad measurement setup for problem gambling and gambling disorder.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 232
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [31] Assessment of Motor Competence Across the Life Span: Aspects of Reliability and Validity of a New Test Battery
    Sigmundsson, Hermundur
    Loras, Havard
    Haga, Monika
    SAGE OPEN, 2016, 6 (01):
  • [32] Assessment of Advanced Life Support competence when combining different test methods - Reliability and validity
    Ringsted, C.
    Lippert, F.
    Hesselfeldt, R.
    Rasmussen, M. B.
    Mogensen, S. S.
    Frost, T.
    Jensen, M. L.
    Jensen, M. K.
    Van der Vleuten, C.
    RESUSCITATION, 2007, 75 (01) : 153 - 160
  • [33] Naming Test of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery: Reliability and Validity in a Sample of Patients with Acquired Brain Injury
    Zgaljardic, Dennis J.
    Oden, Kathryn E.
    Dickson, Sid
    Plenger, Patrick M.
    Lambert, Matthew E.
    Miller, Rebekah
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 28 (08) : 859 - 865
  • [34] Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review
    Paul S. Nolet
    Hainan Yu
    Pierre Côté
    Anne-Laure Meyer
    Vicki L. Kristman
    Deborah Sutton
    Kent Murnaghan
    Nadège Lemeunier
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 29
  • [35] Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review
    Nolet, Paul S.
    Yu, Hainan
    Cote, Pierre
    Meyer, Anne-Laure
    Kristman, Vicki L.
    Sutton, Deborah
    Murnaghan, Kent
    Lemeunier, Nadege
    CHIROPRACTIC & MANUAL THERAPIES, 2021, 29 (01)
  • [36] The Validity and Reliability of Available Intimate Partner Homicide and Reassault Risk Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review
    Graham, Laurie M.
    Sahay, Kashika M.
    Rizo, Cynthia F.
    Messing, Jill T.
    Macy, Rebecca J.
    TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE, 2021, 22 (01) : 18 - 40
  • [37] Reliability, validity and relevance of needs assessment instruments for informal dementia caregivers: a psychometric systematic review
    Kipfer, Stephanie
    Pihet, Sandrine
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (04) : 704 - 742
  • [38] Single word test for the assessment of speech sound production in Persian speaking children: Development, validity and reliability
    Ahmadi, Akram
    Ebadi, Abbas
    Kamali, Mohammad
    Zarifian, Talieh
    Kazemi, Mehdi Dastjerdi
    Mohamadi, Reyhane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 114 : 61 - 66
  • [39] The reliability and validity of the Timed Up and Go test in patients ongoing or following lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ozden, Fatih
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 60 (01)
  • [40] Functioning in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Functioning Assessment Short Test
    Leda-Rego, Gabriela
    Bezerra-Filho, Severino
    Miranda-Scippa, Angela
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2020, 22 (06) : 569 - 581