Engagement and creativity in gamified remote co-design workshops: A comparison experimental study

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Ziheng [1 ]
Patricio, Rui [2 ]
Zurlo, Francesco [3 ]
Carella, Gianluca [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Acad Fine Arts, 168 Waihuanxi Rd, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Unidade Invest Design & Comunicacao, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Politecn Milan, Milan, Italy
关键词
Co-design; gamification; engagement; creativity; USER ENGAGEMENT; GAMIFICATION; GAMES;
D O I
10.1080/14606925.2024.2351705
中图分类号
J [艺术];
学科分类号
13 ; 1301 ;
摘要
The co-design approach is increasingly popular in facilitating the interchange of knowledge among multiple stakeholders. However, a new challenge emerged during the post-pandemic era when working from home became normal: how to facilitate co-design workshops remotely? The gamification tools, which involve the use of game elements in non-game contexts, appear to be a promising solution for re-engaging teams in online co-design workshops. To investigate this potential, we conducted an explorative experiment in an educational co-design setting with 46 Master's students participating. By comparing the use of an online gamification tool 'ideaGardener' in the gamified workshops with an ad hoc 'non-game' tool in the comparison non-game workshops, we found that participants experiencing gamified workshops reported significantly higher levels of engagement. Moreover, we invited five experts to rate all the developed concepts from these workshops regarding the students' performance of creativity. The results indicated that the concepts developed from the gamified workshops were acknowledged by the experts as having more novelty. This article provides practical implications that suggest the use of gamification tools in remote co-design workshops to achieve a higher level of participant engagement and more novel outcomes. It also discusses several educational implications based on the educational experimental context.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 629
页数:21
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   The fuzzy front-end and the forgotten back-end: User involvement in later development phases [J].
Almqvist, Frida .
DESIGN JOURNAL, 2017, 20 :S2524-S2533
[2]   Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework [J].
Anderson, Neil ;
Potocnik, Kristina ;
Zhou, Jing .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (05) :1297-1333
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, NATURE, V493, P133
[4]   Toward a Taxonomy Linking Game Attributes to Learning: An Empirical Study [J].
Bedwell, Wendy L. ;
Pavlas, Davin ;
Heyne, Kyle ;
Lazzara, Elizabeth H. ;
Salas, Eduardo .
SIMULATION & GAMING, 2012, 43 (06) :729-760
[5]  
Berkling Kay, 2013, 2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), P525, DOI 10.1109/ICL.2013.6644642
[6]   The Promise of Co-Design for Public Policy [J].
Blomkamp, Emma .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 77 (04) :729-743
[7]  
Brandt Eva, 2008, CoDesign, V4, P51, DOI 10.1080/15710880801905724
[8]  
Brandt E., 2006, Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design, V1, P57, DOI [10.1145/1147261.1147271, DOI 10.1145/1147261.1147271]
[9]  
Burkett I., 2012, An introduction to co-design, P12
[10]  
Connolly T, 2009, Games-Based Learning Advancements for Multi-Sensory Human Computer Interfaces: Techniques and Effective Practices, P232, DOI [DOI 10.4018/978-1-60566-360-9.CH014, 10.4018/978-1-60566-360-9.ch014]