Developing and validating a prediction model of live birth following single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer

被引:3
作者
Sokol, Piotr [1 ]
Clua, Elisabet [1 ]
Pons, Maria Carme [1 ]
Garcia, Sandra [1 ]
Racca, Annalisa [1 ]
Freour, Thomas [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Polyzos, Nikolaos P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dexeus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Med, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Ghent, Fac Hlth, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Nantes Univ, CHU Nantes, Inserm, CR2TI, F-44000 Nantes, France
[4] CHU Nantes, Serv Med & Biol Reprod, F-44000 Nantes, France
关键词
Live birth rate; prediction model; vitrification day; embryo grade; blastocyst; HUMAN PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYOS; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; RISK CLASSIFICATION; ANEUPLOIDY; IVF; PARAMETERS; IMPLANTATION; STIMULATION; ASSOCIATION; INFERTILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.103890
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Research question: Can the developed clinical prediction model offer an accurate estimate of the likelihood of live birth, involving blastocyst morphology and vitrification day after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT), and therefore assist clinicians and patients? Study design: Retrospective cohort study conducted at a Spanish university-based reproductive medicine unit (2017-2021) including consecutive vitrified-warmed blastocysts from IVF cycles. A multivariable logistic regression incorporated key live birth predictors: vitrification day, embryo score, embryo ploidy status and clinically relevant variables, i.e. maternal age. Results: The training set involved 1653 SVBT cycles carried out between 2017 and 2020; 592 SVBT cycles from 2021 constituted the external validation dataset. The model revealed that female age and embryo characteristics, including overall quality and blastulation day, is linked to live birth rate in SVBT cycles. Stratification by vitrification day and quality (from day -5A to day -6 C blastocysts) applied to genetically tested and untested embryos. The model's area under the curve was 0.66 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.69) during development and 0.65 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.70) in validation, denoting moderate discrimination. Calibration plots showed strong agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Conclusion: By incorporating essential predictors such as vitrification day, embryo morphology grade, age and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy usage, this predictive model offers valuable guidance to clinicians and patients, enabling accurate forecasts of live birth rates for any given vitrified blastocyst within SVBT cycles. Additionally, it serves as a potentially indispensable laboratory tool, aiding in selecting the most promising blastocysts for optimal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Adamson GD, 2022, HUM REPROD, V37
[2]   Molecular and ultrastuctural changes of rat pre-implantation embryos during two-cell developmental arrest [J].
Agca, Cansu ;
Agca, Yuksel .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2014, 31 (06) :767-780
[3]   Prediction of live birth in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles by pre-freeze and post-thaw morphology [J].
Ahlstrom, A. ;
Westin, C. ;
Wikland, M. ;
Hardarson, T. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (05) :1199-1209
[4]   Post-warming embryo morphology is associated with live birth: a cohort study of single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles [J].
Allen, Meagan ;
Hale, Lyndon ;
Lantsberg, Daniel ;
Kieu, Violet ;
Stevens, John ;
Stern, Catharyn ;
Gardner, David K. ;
Mizrachi, Yossi .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2022, 39 (02) :417-425
[5]  
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology, 2011, Hum Reprod, V26, P1270, DOI 10.1093/humrep/der037
[6]   Biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects [J].
Alvarez, C ;
Castilla, JA ;
Martínez, L ;
Ramírez, JP ;
Vergara, F ;
Gaforio, JJ .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (10) :2082-2088
[7]   The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a committee opinion [J].
Penzias A. ;
Bendikson K. ;
Butts S. ;
Coutifaris C. ;
Falcone T. ;
Fossum G. ;
Gitlin S. ;
Gracia C. ;
Hansen K. ;
La Barbera A. ;
Mersereau J. ;
Odem R. ;
Paulson R. ;
Pfeifer S. ;
Pisarska M. ;
Rebar R. ;
Reindollar R. ;
Rosen M. ;
Sandlow J. ;
Vernon M. ;
Widra E. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 109 (03) :429-436
[8]   Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction [J].
Armstrong, Sarah ;
Bhide, Priya ;
Jordan, Vanessa ;
Pacey, Allan ;
Marjoribanks, Jane ;
Farquhar, Cindy .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (05)
[9]   A validated model for predicting live birth after embryo transfer [J].
Awadalla, Michael S. ;
Bendikson, Kristin A. ;
Ho, Jacqueline R. ;
McGinnis, Lynda K. ;
Ahmady, Ali .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
[10]   Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes [J].
Bourdon, Mathilde ;
Pocate-Cheriet, Khaled ;
de Bantel, Astri Finet ;
Grzegorczyk-Martin, Veronika ;
Hoffet, Aureli Amar ;
Arbo, Elisangela ;
Poulain, Marine ;
Santulli, Pietro .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 (10) :1948-1964