Strategies for genomic predictions of an indicine multi-breed population using single-step GBLUP

被引:0
|
作者
Londono-Gil, Marisol [1 ,2 ]
Lopez-Correa, Rodrigo [3 ]
Aguilar, Ignacio [4 ]
Magnabosco, Claudio Ulhoa [5 ]
Hidalgo, Jorge [2 ]
Bussiman, Fernando [2 ]
Baldi, Fernando [1 ]
Lourenco, Daniela [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Via Acesso Prof Paulo Donato Castellane S-N, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Anim & Dairy Sci, Athens, GA USA
[3] Univ Republica, Fac Vet, Dept Genet & Mejoramiento Anim, Montevideo, Uruguay
[4] Inst Nacl Invest Agr INIA, Montevideo, Uruguay
[5] Embrapa Cerrados, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
beef cattle; compatibility; LR method; metafounders; reference population; FULL PEDIGREE; CATTLE; METAFOUNDERS; BLUP;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12882
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Brazilian livestock breeding programmes strive to enhance the genetics of beef cattle, with a strong emphasis on the Nellore breed, which has an extensive database and has achieved significant genetic progress in the last years. There are other indicine breeds that are economically important in Brazil; however, these breeds have more modest sets of phenotypes, pedigree and genotypes, slowing down their genetic progress as their predictions are less accurate. Combining several breeds in a multi-breed evaluation could help enhance predictions for those breeds with less information available. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of multi-breed, single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor genomic evaluations for Nellore, Brahman, Guzerat and Tabapua. Multi-breed evaluations were contrasted to the single-breed ones. Data were sourced from the National Association of Breeders and Researchers of Brazil and included pedigree (4,207,516), phenotypic (328,748), and genomic (63,492) information across all breeds. Phenotypes were available for adjusted weight at 210 and 450 days of age, and scrotal circumference at 365 days of age. Various scenarios were evaluated to ensure pedigree and genomic information compatibility when combining different breeds, including metafounders (MF) or building the genomic relationship matrix with breed-specific allele frequencies. Scenarios were compared using the linear regression method for bias, dispersion and accuracy. The results showed that using multi-breed evaluations significantly improved accuracy, especially for smaller breeds like Guzerat and Tabapua. The validation statistics indicated that the MF approach provided accurate predictions, albeit with some bias. While single-breed evaluations tended to have lower accuracy, merging all breeds in multi-breed evaluations increased accuracy and reduced dispersion. This study demonstrates that multi-breed genomic evaluations are proper for indicine beef cattle breeds. The MF approach may be particularly beneficial for less-represented breeds, addressing limitations related to small reference populations and incompatibilities between G and A22. By leveraging genomic information across breeds, breeders and producers can make more informed selection decisions, ultimately improving genetic gain in these cattle populations.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 56
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving Genomic Predictions in Multi-Breed Cattle Populations: A Comparative Analysis of BayesR and GBLUP Models
    Ma, Haoran
    Li, Hongwei
    Ge, Fei
    Zhao, Huqiong
    Zhu, Bo
    Zhang, Lupei
    Gao, Huijiang
    Xu, Lingyang
    Li, Junya
    Wang, Zezhao
    GENES, 2024, 15 (02)
  • [2] Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population
    Gao, Hongding
    Christensen, Ole F.
    Madsen, Per
    Nielsen, Ulrik S.
    Zhang, Yuan
    Lund, Mogens S.
    Su, Guosheng
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2012, 44
  • [3] Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population
    Hongding Gao
    Ole F Christensen
    Per Madsen
    Ulrik S Nielsen
    Yuan Zhang
    Mogens S Lund
    Guosheng Su
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 44
  • [4] A first step toward genomic selection in the multi-breed French dairy goat population
    Carillier, C.
    Larroque, H.
    Palhiere, I.
    Clement, V.
    Rupp, R.
    Robert-Granie, C.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2013, 96 (11) : 7294 - 7305
  • [5] Strategies for imputation to whole genome sequence using a single or multi-breed reference population in cattle
    Rasmus Froberg Brøndum
    Bernt Guldbrandtsen
    Goutam Sahana
    Mogens Sandø Lund
    Guosheng Su
    BMC Genomics, 15
  • [6] Strategies for imputation to whole genome sequence using a single or multi-breed reference population in cattle
    Brondum, Rasmus Froberg
    Guldbrandtsen, Bernt
    Sahana, Goutam
    Lund, Mogens Sando
    Su, Guosheng
    BMC GENOMICS, 2014, 15
  • [7] Multi-breed genomic predictions and functional variants for fertility of tropical bulls
    Porto-Neto, Laercio R.
    Alexandre, Pamela A.
    Hudson, Nicholas J.
    Bertram, John
    McWilliam, Sean M.
    Tan, Andre W. L.
    Fortes, Marina R. S.
    McGowan, Michael R.
    Hayes, Ben J.
    Reverter, Antonio
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [8] Validation of single-step GBLUP genomic predictions from threshold models using the linear regression method: An application in chicken mortality
    Bermann, Matias
    Legarra, Andres
    Hollifield, Mary Kate
    Masuda, Yutaka
    Lourenco, Daniela
    Misztal, Ignacy
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2021, 138 (01) : 4 - 13
  • [9] Validation of single-step GBLUP genomic predictions from threshold models using the linear regression method: an application in chicken mortality
    Bermann, Matias
    Legarra, Andres
    Hollifield, Mary Kate
    Masuda, Yutaka
    Lourenco, Daniela
    Misztal, Ignacy
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 246 - 247
  • [10] An efficient exact method to obtain GBLUP and single-step GBLUP when the genomic relationship matrix is singular
    Rohan L. Fernando
    Hao Cheng
    Dorian J. Garrick
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 48