Learning Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes Using Causal Tree Methods in Medicine

被引:0
作者
Blumlein, Theresa [1 ]
Persson, Joel [1 ]
Feuerriegel, Stefan [2 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Munich, Germany
来源
MACHINE LEARNING FOR HEALTHCARE CONFERENCE, VOL 182 | 2022年 / 182卷
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
MODELS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) are used in medicine to tailor sequential treatment decisions to patients by considering patient heterogeneity. Common methods for learning optimal DTRs, however, have shortcomings: they are typically based on outcome prediction and not treatment effect estimation, or they use linear models that are restrictive for patient data from modern electronic health records. To address these shortcomings, we develop two novel methods for learning optimal DTRs that effectively handle complex patient data. We call our methods DTR causal trees (DTR-CT) and DTR causal forest (DTR-CF). Our methods are based on a data-driven estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects using causal tree methods, specifically causal trees and causal forests, that learn non-linear relationships, control for time-varying confounding, are doubly robust, and explainable. To the best of our knowledge, our paper is the first that adapts causal tree methods for learning optimal DTRs. We evaluate our proposed methods using synthetic data and then apply them to real-world data from intensive care units. Our methods outperform state-of-the-art baselines in terms of cumulative regret and percentage of optimal decisions by a considerable margin. Our work improves treatment recommendations from electronic health record and is thus of direct relevance for personalized medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 171
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Analyzing Patient Trajectories With Artificial Intelligence [J].
Allam, Ahmed ;
Feuerriegel, Stefan ;
Rebhan, Michael ;
Krauthammer, Michael .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (12)
[2]   Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective [J].
Amann, Julia ;
Blasimme, Alessandro ;
Vayena, Effy ;
Frey, Dietmar ;
Madai, Vince I. .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 20 (01)
[3]   GENERALIZED RANDOM FORESTS [J].
Athey, Susan ;
Tibshirani, Julie ;
Wager, Stefan .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2019, 47 (02) :1148-1178
[4]   Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects [J].
Athey, Susan ;
Imbens, Guido .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (27) :7353-7360
[5]  
Athey Susan., 2019, OBSERVATIONAL STUDIE, V5, P21, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-08-102192-7.00001-1, DOI 10.1353/OBS.2019.0001, 10.1353/obs.2019.0001]
[6]  
Beygelzimer Alina, 2013, R package
[7]   A Selection Bias Approach to Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Effects [J].
Blackwell, Matthew .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 22 (02) :169-182
[8]  
Brieman L., 1984, Classification and regression trees, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781315139470
[9]  
Chakraborty B., 2013, STAT METHODS DYNAMIC, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7428-9
[10]   Machine intelligence in healthcare-perspectives on trustworthiness, explainability, usability, and transparency [J].
Cutillo, Christine M. ;
Sharma, Karlie R. ;
Foschini, Luca ;
Kundu, Shinjini ;
Mackintosh, Maxine ;
Mandl, Kenneth D. ;
Beck, Tyler ;
Collier, Elaine ;
Colvis, Christine ;
Gersing, Kenneth ;
Gordon, Valery ;
Jensen, Roxanne ;
Shabestari, Behrouz ;
Southall, Noel .
NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2020, 3 (01)