Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Han, Ryan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Acosta, Julian N. [4 ,5 ]
Shakeri, Zahra [6 ]
Ioannidis, John P. A. [7 ,8 ]
Topol, Eric J. [9 ]
Rajpurkar, Pranav [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Biomed Informat, Boston, MA USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Angeles, Caltech Med ScientistTraining Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Dept Neurol, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Rad AI, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Stanford Univ, Stanford Prevent Res Ctr, Dept Med, Stanford, CA USA
[8] Stanford Univ, Meta Res Innovat Ctr Stanford, Stanford, CA USA
[9] Scripps Res, Scripps Res Translat Inst, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
来源
LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 6卷 / 05期
关键词
MULTICENTER; ALGORITHM; HEALTH; CARE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
This scoping review of randomised controlled trials on artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice reveals an expanding interest in AI across clinical specialties and locations. The USA and China are leading in the number of trials, with a focus on deep learning systems for medical imaging, particularly in gastroenterology and radiology. A majority of trials (70 [81%] of 86) report positive primary endpoints, primarily related to diagnostic yield or performance; however, the predominance of single-centre trials, little demographic reporting, and varying reports of operational efficiency raise concerns about the generalisability and practicality of these results. Despite the promising outcomes, considering the likelihood of publication bias and the need for more comprehensive research including multicentre trials, diverse outcome measures, and improved reporting standards is crucial. Future AI trials should prioritise patient-relevant outcomes to fully understand AI's true effects and limitations in health care.
引用
收藏
页码:e367 / e373
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Reporting guidelines for clinical trials evaluating artificial intelligence interventions are needed
    Liu, Xiaoxuan
    Rivera, Samantha Cruz
    Faes, Livia
    Di Ruffano, Lavinia Ferrante
    Yau, Christopher
    Keane, Pearse A.
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Darzi, Ara
    Vollmer, Sebastian J.
    Deeks, Jonathan
    Bachmann, Lucas
    Holmes, Christopher
    Chan, An Wen
    Moher, David
    Calvert, Melanie J.
    Denniston, Alastair K.
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2019, 25 (10) : 1467 - 1468
  • [33] The use of linked administrative data in Australian randomised controlled trials: A scoping review
    Fahridin, Salma
    Agarwal, Neeru
    Bracken, Karen
    Law, Stephen
    Morton, Rachael L.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2024, 21 (04)
  • [34] Goal attainment scaling as an outcome measure for randomised controlled trials: a scoping review
    Logan, Benignus
    Jegatheesan, Dev
    Viecelli, Andrea
    Pascoe, Elaine
    Hubbard, Ruth
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [35] Advance consent for participation in randomised controlled trials for emergency conditions: a scoping review
    Niznick, Naomi
    Lun, Ronda
    Dewar, Brian
    Perry, Jeffrey
    Dowlatshahi, Dar
    Shamy, Michel
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [36] Addressing missing outcome data in randomised controlled trials: A methodological scoping review
    Medcalf, Ellie
    Turner, Robin M.
    Espinoza, David
    He, Vicky
    Bell, Katy J. L.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2024, 143
  • [37] Statistical analyses of ordinal outcomes in randomised controlled trials: protocol for a scoping review
    Selman, Chris J.
    Lee, Katherine J.
    Whitehead, Clare L.
    Manley, Brett J.
    Mahar, Robert K.
    TRIALS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [38] Statistical analyses of ordinal outcomes in randomised controlled trials: protocol for a scoping review
    Chris J. Selman
    Katherine J. Lee
    Clare L. Whitehead
    Brett J. Manley
    Robert K. Mahar
    Trials, 24
  • [39] Participant recruitment and retention in randomised controlled trials of melanoma surveillance: A scoping review
    Ackermann, Deonna M.
    Bracken, Karen
    Hersch, Jolyn K.
    Janda, Monika
    Turner, Robin M.
    Bell, Katy J. L.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 44
  • [40] Artificial intelligence for optimizing recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a scoping review( vol 31, pg 2749 , 2024)
    Lu, Xiaoran
    Yang, Chen
    Liang, Lu
    Hu, Guanyu
    Zhong, Ziyi
    Jiang, Zihao
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2024, 32 (01) : 260 - 260