Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Han, Ryan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Acosta, Julian N. [4 ,5 ]
Shakeri, Zahra [6 ]
Ioannidis, John P. A. [7 ,8 ]
Topol, Eric J. [9 ]
Rajpurkar, Pranav [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Biomed Informat, Boston, MA USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Angeles, Caltech Med ScientistTraining Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Dept Neurol, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Rad AI, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Stanford Univ, Stanford Prevent Res Ctr, Dept Med, Stanford, CA USA
[8] Stanford Univ, Meta Res Innovat Ctr Stanford, Stanford, CA USA
[9] Scripps Res, Scripps Res Translat Inst, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
来源
LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 6卷 / 05期
关键词
MULTICENTER; ALGORITHM; HEALTH; CARE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
This scoping review of randomised controlled trials on artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice reveals an expanding interest in AI across clinical specialties and locations. The USA and China are leading in the number of trials, with a focus on deep learning systems for medical imaging, particularly in gastroenterology and radiology. A majority of trials (70 [81%] of 86) report positive primary endpoints, primarily related to diagnostic yield or performance; however, the predominance of single-centre trials, little demographic reporting, and varying reports of operational efficiency raise concerns about the generalisability and practicality of these results. Despite the promising outcomes, considering the likelihood of publication bias and the need for more comprehensive research including multicentre trials, diverse outcome measures, and improved reporting standards is crucial. Future AI trials should prioritise patient-relevant outcomes to fully understand AI's true effects and limitations in health care.
引用
收藏
页码:e367 / e373
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Artificial Intelligence Applications in Health Care Practice: Scoping Review
    Sharma, Malvika
    Savage, Carl
    Nair, Monika
    Larsson, Ingrid
    Svedberg, Petra
    Nygren, Jens M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (10)
  • [22] Metrics for Evaluating Telemedicine in Randomized Controlled Trials: Scoping Review
    Sugawara, Yuka
    Hirakawa, Yosuke
    Iwagami, Masao
    Inokuchi, Ryota
    Wakimizu, Rie
    Nangaku, Masaomi
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27
  • [23] A scoping review of outcome measures in randomised controlled trials of pleural infection
    Hughes, Jessica
    Rudd, Sarah
    Milne, Alice
    Maskell, Nick
    Arnold, David
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62
  • [24] Statistical analyses of ordinal outcomes in randomised controlled trials: a scoping review
    Selman, Chris J.
    Lee, Katherine J.
    Ferguson, Kristin N.
    Whitehead, Clare L.
    Manley, Brett J.
    Mahar, Robert K.
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [25] Clinical Practice Settings vs Clinical Trials Is Artificial Intelligence the Answer?
    Jampol, Lee Merrill
    Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula M.
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 138 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [26] Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Management of Male Infertility, a Scoping Review
    Naik, Noopur
    Roth, Bradley
    Lundy, Scott D.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2025, 26 (01)
  • [27] Monitoring performance of clinical artificial intelligence: a scoping review protocol
    Andersen, Eline Sandvig
    Birk-Korch, Johan Baden
    Rottger, Richard
    Brasen, Claus Lohman
    Brandslund, Ivan
    Madsen, Jonna Skov
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2024, 22 (03) : 453 - 460
  • [28] Moving artificial intelligence development to deployment in ophthalmology: randomised controlled trials are warranted
    Zhang, Shuyi
    Nguyen, Truong X.
    Liu, Xujia
    Szeto, Simon K. H.
    Cheung, Carol Y.
    Ran, An Ran
    EYE, 2025, 39 (05) : 816 - 818
  • [29] Barriers and facilitators of artificial intelligence conception and implementation for breast imaging diagnosis in clinical practice: a scoping review
    Lokaj, Belinda
    Pugliese, Marie-Therese
    Kinkel, Karen
    Lovis, Christian
    Schmid, Jerome
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (03) : 2096 - 2109
  • [30] Barriers and facilitators of artificial intelligence conception and implementation for breast imaging diagnosis in clinical practice: a scoping review
    Belinda Lokaj
    Marie-Thérèse Pugliese
    Karen Kinkel
    Christian Lovis
    Jérôme Schmid
    European Radiology, 2024, 34 : 2096 - 2109