Diffusion of tax-related communication on social media

被引:2
作者
Puklavec, Ziga [1 ]
Stavrova, Olga [1 ,2 ]
Kogler, Christoph [1 ]
Zeelenberg, Marcel [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Social Psychol, TIBER, POB 90153, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Univ Lubeck, Dept Psychol, Lubeck, Germany
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Mkt, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Taxation; Information diffusion; Social media; Emotions; Moral language; MORALIZED CONTENT; NORMS; EMOTION; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.socec.2024.102203
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Taxation is a recurrent topic in people's conversations, also on social media. Yet, informal channels such as social media have been widely neglected in studies that examined how information about taxation spreads across social networks. Using posts on Twitter (currently called "X") with taxation related hashtags from 2010 to 2020, we examined what linguistic cues are associated with information diffusion, that is, the number of retweets a message receives. The use of emotional, moral, and moral-emotional language in a tweet was associated with greater diffusion (i.e., more retweets). In contrast to the negativity bias literature, positive emotional words were more strongly associated with information diffusion than negative emotional words. Among the specific emotions that taxation research has focused on, only the use of anger (but not anxiety) words was associated with more retweets. The study contributes to the literature by examining individuals' reasoning about taxes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [11] Braithwaite V., 2003, TAXING DEMOCRACY, V3, P15
  • [12] glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling
    Brooks, Mollie E.
    Kristensen, Kasper
    van Benthem, Koen J.
    Magnusson, Arni
    Berg, Casper W.
    Nielsen, Anders
    Skaug, Hans J.
    Machler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    [J]. R JOURNAL, 2017, 9 (02): : 378 - 400
  • [13] Burton J. W., 2019, COGSCI 2019
  • [14] Castro E., 2019, IDB Discussion Paper No. 665, DOI [10.18235/0001661, DOI 10.18235/0001661]
  • [15] Chavoshi N, 2016, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V10047, P14, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47874-6_2
  • [16] Chu Z, 2010, 26TH ANNUAL COMPUTER SECURITY APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (ACSAC 2010), P21
  • [17] A FOCUS THEORY OF NORMATIVE CONDUCT - RECYCLING THE CONCEPT OF NORMS TO REDUCE LITTERING IN PUBLIC PLACES
    CIALDINI, RB
    RENO, RR
    KALLGREN, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 58 (06) : 1015 - 1026
  • [18] Compliance Behavior in Networks: Evidence from a Field Experiment
    Drago, Francesco
    Mengel, Friederike
    Traxler, Christian
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 12 (02) : 96 - 133
  • [19] The role of emotions in tax compliance behavior: A mixed-methods approach
    Enachescu, Janina
    Olsen, Jerome
    Kogler, Christoph
    Zeelenberg, Marcel
    Breugelmans, Seger M.
    Kirchler, Erich
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 74
  • [20] Erard B., 2018, National Taxpayer Advocate Annual Report to Congress, V2, P77