Camrelizumab combined with anlotinib as second-line therapy for metastatic or recurrent small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Shen, Shujing [1 ]
Li, Xingya [2 ]
Guo, Sanxing [2 ]
Xu, Liang [3 ]
Yan, Ningning [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiat Oncol, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Med Oncol, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Third Hosp Nanchang City, Prevent & Cure Ctr Breast Dis, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
camrelizumab; anlotinib; small-cell lung cancer; extensive stage; second-line setting; SINTILIMAB PLUS ANLOTINIB; PHASE-III TRIAL; SINGLE-ARM; OPEN-LABEL; TOPOTECAN; MULTICENTER; IPILIMUMAB; CARCINOMA; PEMBROLIZUMAB; NIVOLUMAB;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1391828
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of camrelizumab combined with anlotinib versus chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) undergoing second-line treatment. Methods: Data were sourced from medical records at a Chinese medical facility, involving 34 patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC after failing first-line treatment. Patients were divided into two groups: one received camrelizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) with anlotinib (12 mg daily for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest), while the other group received physician-chosen chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Results: The combination therapy group showed a significant improvement in PFS compared to the chemotherapy group (median PFS: 7 months vs. 3 months; hazard ratio (HR): 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15-0.77; p<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between the groups (16.3 months vs. 17.3 months; p=0.82). The ORR was 52.9% in the combination therapy group versus 23.5% in the chemotherapy group (p=0.08), and the DCR was 82.4% compared to 58.8% (p=0.26). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 17.6% of the combination therapy group and 29.4% of the chemotherapy group. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the combination of camrelizumab and anlotinib offers a superior anti-tumor response with a manageable safety profile in a second-line setting for ES-SCLC patients. This combination regimen may be a viable option for second-line ES-SCLC treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Considerations for second-line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer
    Stinchcombe, Thomas E.
    Socinski, Mark A.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2008, 13 : 28 - 36
  • [22] Second-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Hann C.L.
    Brahmer J.R.
    Current Oncology Reports, 2006, 8 (4) : 243 - 247
  • [23] SECOND-LINE THERAPY FOR ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
    Cullen, M.
    LUNG CANCER, 2009, 64 : S13 - S13
  • [24] Evaluation of systemic second-line therapy in recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer
    Bacinschi, Xenia E.
    Zgura, Anca
    Stanuica, Monica, I
    Iliescu, Laura
    Anghel, Rodica M.
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MILITARY MEDICINE, 2021, 124 (02) : 203 - 210
  • [25] Phase 2 Study of Pemetrexed and Itraconazole as Second-Line Therapy for Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Rudin, Charles M.
    Brahmer, Julie R.
    Juergens, Rosalyn A.
    Hann, Christine L.
    Ettinger, David S.
    Sebree, Rosa
    Smith, Ruth
    Aftab, Blake T.
    Huang, Peng
    Liu, Jun O.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8 (05) : 619 - 623
  • [26] A retrospective study for the significance of second-line therapy for unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer
    Kawamoto, Yasuyuki
    Komatsu, Yoshito
    Yamamura, Takahiro
    Saito, Rika
    Ito, Ken
    Nakano, Shintaro
    Harada, Kazuaki
    Yuki, Satoshi
    Kuwatani, Masaki
    Sakamoto, Naoya
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S333 - S333
  • [27] Efficacy and toxicity of anlotinib plus camrelizumab versus anlotinib plus S-1 as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A real-world retrospective study
    Zhang, Wei
    Chen, Mingyu
    Dai, Hong
    Sun, Wei
    CANCER PATHOGENESIS AND THERAPY, 2024, 2 (04): : 276 - 284
  • [28] Synergistic effect of additional anlotinib and immunotherapy as second-line or later-line treatment in pancreatic cancer: A retrospective cohort study
    Qin, Boyu
    Xiong, Qi
    Xin, Lingli
    Li, Ke
    Shi, Weiwei
    Song, Qi
    Sun, Qiong
    Shao, Jiakang
    Zhang, Jing
    Zhao, Xiao
    Liu, Jinyu
    Wang, Jinliang
    Yang, Bo
    CANCER INNOVATION, 2024, 3 (04):
  • [29] Intracranial complete response to toripalimab and anlotinib in a patient with recurrent brain metastases of small cell lung cancer after failure of second-line maintenance therapy: a case report
    Huang, Fengxiang
    Tang, Jiaqi
    Lou, Jiaojiao
    Wang, Qilong
    Ma, Kai
    Qiao, Ruiping
    Si, Jiming
    Kang, Yan
    Chen, Hongjie
    Mei, Jingjing
    Wang, Huanqin
    Liu, Yuanhua
    Miao, Lijun
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (09) : 3337 - 3342
  • [30] Retrospective review of paditaxel beyond second-line therapy in patients with small cell cancer
    Kalwar, Tricia L.
    Raftopoulos, Haralambos
    Paul, Doru
    Devoe, Craig E.
    Kohn, Nina
    Fields, Scott Z.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)