Strategies for Evaluating Collective Impact Initiatives: Lessons Learned from a Community-Academic Partnership

被引:0
作者
DeZelar, Margaret [1 ]
Burns, Maureen T. S. [2 ]
Rosania, Kimberly [3 ]
Bohnert, Amy M. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Loyola Univ Chicago, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Div Child & Adolescent Psychiat, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Loyola Univ Chicago, 215 Coffey Hall,1032 W Sheridan Rd, Chicago, IL 60626 USA
关键词
collective impact; evaluation; program evaluation; community health; SOCIAL DETERMINANTS; HEALTH; DISPARITIES; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1177/10982140241244782
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Collective impact (CI) initiatives provide a promising collaborative community-based approach for addressing health disparities, but they are challenging to evaluate. This paper provides a detailed strategy for addressing these challenges through a case study, with the goal of not only of evaluating the CI, but also putting organizations in a position to implement and maintain sustainable self-evaluation efforts over time. A three-phase evaluation strategy was developed and implemented via a community-academic partnership to assess the impact of the CI. Process and outcome data from a CI to address health disparities in a Chicago community were collected and analyzed. The evaluation strategy, following the developmental, formative, and summative phases, helped a CI overcome barriers and build capacity for ongoing evaluative work for its members. Considering the flexible, low-technology approach, this strategy is a valuable resource in assisting individuals seeking to create a successful and sustainable CI evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 547
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ACS DEMOGRAPHIC HOUS
[2]   Measuring community capacity: Where do we go from here? [J].
Baker, EA ;
Teaser-Polk, C .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 1998, 25 (03) :279-283
[3]  
Brown P., 1995, NEW APPROACHES EVALU, P127
[4]  
Cabaj M., 2014, PHILANTHROPIST, V26, P1
[5]  
Chavis D., 2001, PRINCIPLES EVALUATIN
[6]   The bottom-up approach to integrative validity: A new perspective for program evaluation [J].
Chen, Huey T. .
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2010, 33 (03) :205-214
[7]   Lessons learned about collaborative evaluation using the Capacity for Applying Project Evaluation (CAPE) framework with school and district leaders [J].
Corn, Jenifer O. ;
Byrom, Elizabeth ;
Knestis, Kirk ;
Matzen, Nita ;
Thrift, Beth .
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2012, 35 (04) :535-542
[8]   Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community health and development [J].
Fawcett, SB ;
PaineAndrews, A ;
Francisco, VT ;
Schultz, JA ;
Richter, KP ;
Lewis, RK ;
Williams, EL ;
Harris, KJ ;
Berkley, JY ;
Fisher, JL ;
Lopez, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 23 (05) :677-697
[9]   An ecological assessment of community-based interventions for prevention and health promotion: Approaches to measuring community coalitions [J].
Goodman, RM ;
Wandersman, A ;
Chinman, M ;
Imm, P ;
Morrissey, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 24 (01) :33-61
[10]   Evaluating community coalition characteristics and functioning: a summary of measurement tools [J].
Granner, ML ;
Sharpe, PA .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2004, 19 (05) :514-532