Energy, urbanization, and complexity: Towards a multi-scale ecological economic theory of innovation

被引:2
作者
Menegat, Stefano [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Econ & Stat, Lungo Dora Siena 100A, I-10154 Turin, Italy
关键词
Theory of innovation; Technology; Thermodynamics; Declining marginal returns to complexity; Limits to growth; GEORGESCU-ROEGEN; FOUNDATIONS; INEQUALITY; GROWTH; LIMITS; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108230
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The concept of innovation is at the core of any attempt to draft a meaningful theory of economic change. Whether by reducing innovations to the "myth of the sole inventor" or by adopting technological determinism, dominant narratives ignore the complexity of the socio-ecological relations underpinning patterns of societal transformation. This article proposes a framework grounded in critical realism and ecological economics to characterise innovations as elements endogenous to historical patterns of socio-ecological reproduction. Departing from Schumpeter's definition of creative response and Georgescu-Roegen's concept of exosomatic evolution, I discuss three main arguments: first, the relation between innovations and socio-economic change is impredicative, because the direction of causality cannot be clearly established; second, the emergence of innovations is bounded by declining marginal returns to economic complexity. Third, economic change has to be contextualised in relation to historical cycles of energy use and economic complexification. These arguments corroborate the hypothesis that a long-lasting S-shaped wave of innovation took place in capitalist economies over the past two centuries. This article has several implications for the study of both innovation waves and economic growth, in particular, by proposing a new framework to conceptualise productivity, energy, and labour as cornerstones of a multi-scale theory of innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Mapping degrees of complexity, complicatedness, and emergent complexity
    Allen, Timothy F. H.
    Austin, Preston
    Giampietro, Mario
    Kovacic, Zora
    Ramly, Edmond
    Tainter, Joseph
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2018, 35 : 39 - 44
  • [2] Ayres R.U., 1996, IND ECOLOGY CLOSING
  • [3] Energy, property, and the industrial revolution narrative
    Barca, Stefania
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (07) : 1309 - 1315
  • [4] Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities
    Bettencourt, Luis M. A.
    Lobo, Jose
    Helbing, Dirk
    Kuehnert, Christian
    West, Geoffrey B.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (17) : 7301 - 7306
  • [5] Bonaiuti M, 2014, The Great Transition, DOI [10.4324/9781315819570, DOI 10.4324/9781315819570]
  • [6] Are we entering the age of involuntary degrowth? Promethean technologies and declining returns of innovation
    Bonaiuti, Mauro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 : 1800 - 1809
  • [7] Brandt Karl, 1961, Food Research Institute Studies. Stanford University, V2, P83
  • [8] The global political economy of climate change, agriculture and food systems
    Clapp, Jennifer
    Newell, Peter
    Brent, Zoe W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2018, 45 (01) : 80 - 88
  • [9] Cobb C., 1995, REDEFINING PROGR
  • [10] Cowen T., 2011, GREAT STAGNATION AM