Navigating Between Control and Trust: The Whistleblowing Mindset

被引:3
作者
Arroyo, Paulina [1 ]
Berger, Leslie [2 ]
Smaili, Nadia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Montreal, Sch Management, Dept Accounting Studies, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
[2] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, KPMG Fdn Fellow Accounting, Lazaridis Sch Business & Econ, Waterloo, ON, Canada
关键词
Whistleblowing; Autonomous motivation; Controlled motivation; Controls; Trust; Whistleblowing program; Whistleblowing mindset; Values congruence; Nonprofit organizations; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST; EMPLOYEES; MOTIVATION; ACCOUNTABILITY; RETALIATION; ENGAGEMENT; MODEL; POWER;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-024-05807-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Whistleblowing is the most effective way to unveil wrongdoings. Indeed, whistleblowers often protect their organizations by providing crucial information. While existing research about whistleblowing focuses on the intentions of whistleblowers to report a wrongdoing after a wrongdoing is observed, we seek to understand how individuals view whistleblowing before a wrongdoing is observed. Drawing on self-determination theory our findings of 34 interviews at diverse Canadian nonprofit organizations support our framework and highlight that when a congruence of shared values exists, trust functions as a core belief of the organization, which positively influences an autonomous view of whistleblowing. Based on our findings, we propose a conceptualization of whistleblowing mindset as the root of whistleblowing behaviours that can be influenced by shared or divergent values. We define a whistleblowing mindset as a mental disposition that predetermines individual interpretations and reactions to the witness of a wrongdoing. Our research contributes to the literature by establishing the importance of the whistleblowing mindset in the implementation of whistleblowing programs and providing insights into how shared values can influence the autonomous view in individuals' whistleblowing mindsets.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 35
页数:17
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   Antecedents, Consequences, and Context of Employee Engagement in Nonprofit Organizations [J].
Akingbola, Kunle ;
van den Berg, Herman A. .
REVIEW OF PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 39 (01) :46-74
[2]   Organizational responses to multiple logics: Diversity, identity and the professional service firm [J].
Anderson-Gough, Fiona ;
Edgley, Carla ;
Robson, Keith ;
Sharma, Nina .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2022, 103
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Public Law 111-203 [H.R. 4173]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Public Law 107-204 [H.R. 3763]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior
[6]   Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations [J].
Bachmann, R .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2001, 22 (02) :337-365
[7]   Accounting research and trust: a literature review [J].
Baldvinsdottir, Gudrun ;
Hagberg, Andreas ;
Johansson, Inga-Lill ;
Jonall, Kristina ;
Marton, Jan .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 8 (04) :382-+
[8]   COLLECTIVE ORGANIZATIONAL ENGAGEMENT: LINKING MOTIVATIONAL ANTECEDENTS, STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE [J].
Barrick, Murray R. ;
Thurgood, Gary R. ;
Smith, Troy A. ;
Courtright, Stephen H. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 58 (01) :111-135
[9]   An Experimental Study of Voluntary Nonprofit Accountability and Effects on Public Trust, Reputation, Perceived Quality, and Donation Behavior [J].
Becker, Annika .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2018, 47 (03) :562-582
[10]  
Berg B., 2011, Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, V8th