Corporate ESG investments and Firm 's value under the real-option framework: Evidence from two world-leading economies

被引:31
作者
Bagh, Tanveer [1 ]
Jiang, Fuwei [1 ]
Khan, Muhammad Asif [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Kotli AJK, Dept Commerce, Kotli, Pakistan
关键词
China; ESG investment; Firm value; Listed firms; Real-option framework; US; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; GROWTH OPTIONS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; RISK; SUSTAINABILITY; DISCLOSURE; SPECIFICATION; VALUATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.bir.2024.01.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Under the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs), the United States (US) and China have ambitious environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investment plans. However, dichotomy is found in the literature about how rising ESG practices affect firm value (FV). This study examines the linear and nonlinear effect of ESG practices on FV and how growth-option value (GV) moderates this connection in the real -option framework. We use data on 5220 listed US and Chinese firms from 2018 to 2022 with a generalized method of moments model. The empirical results confirm that ESG practices nonlinearly affect FV, implying that ESG practices turn FV trajectory from positive to negative, and the degree of this effect varies across the sample but is more pronounced at Chinese firms than US firms. We also find that GV negatively moderates the nexus between ESG practices and FV across the sample. Our endogeneity-adjusted results pass robustness tests and have important policy implications.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 340
页数:17
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   Financial and corporate social performance in the UK listed firms: the relevance of non-linearity and lag effects [J].
Adegbite, Emmanuel ;
Guney, Yilmaz ;
Kwabi, Frank ;
Tahir, Suleiman .
REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2019, 52 (01) :105-158
[2]   Does it pay to deliver superior ESG performance? Evidence from US S&P 500 companies [J].
Ademi, Bejtush ;
Klungseth, Nora Johanne .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY, 2022, 13 (04) :421-449
[3]   Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: An international perspective [J].
Aerts, Walter ;
Cormier, Denis ;
Magnan, Michel .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 64 (03) :643-659
[4]   How institutional theories explain and fail to explain organizations [J].
Aksom, Herman ;
Tymchenko, Inna .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 33 (07) :1223-1252
[5]   Environmental, social and governance impact on financial performance: evidence from the Levant countries [J].
Al Amosh, Hamzeh ;
Khatib, Saleh F. A. ;
Ananzeh, Husam .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2023, 23 (03) :493-513
[6]   The relationship between social entrepreneurship and sustainable development from economic growth perspective: 15 'RCEP' countries [J].
Al-Qudah, Anas Ali ;
Al-Okaily, Manaf ;
Alqudah, Hamza .
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FINANCE & INVESTMENT, 2022, 12 (01) :44-61
[7]   Firm heterogeneity in growth option value: The role of managerial incentives [J].
Alessandri, Todd M. ;
Tong, Tony W. ;
Reuer, Jeffrey J. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (13) :1557-1566
[8]   Sustainability Practices and Corporate Financial Performance: A Study Based on the Top Global Corporations [J].
Ameer, Rashid ;
Othman, Radiah .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2012, 108 (01) :61-79
[9]   Empirical evidence on capital investment, growth options, and security returns [J].
Anderson, CW ;
Garcia-Feijóo, L .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2006, 61 (01) :171-194
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Report on US sustainable and impact investing trends