Latitude or Latent Control? How Occupational Embeddedness and Control Shape Emergent Coordination

被引:42
作者
Bechky, Beth A. [1 ]
Chung, Daisy E. [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Stern Sch Business, Dept Management & Org, 40 W 4th St,Tisch Hall, New York, NY 10012 USA
[2] City Univ London, Cass Business Sch, Dept Management, 106 Bunhill Row, London EC1Y 8TZ, England
关键词
work; conflict and cooperation; work groups; film crews; occupational communities; COMMUNITIES; KNOWLEDGE; WORK; ORGANIZATIONS; BUREAUCRACY; EXPERTISE; WORKPLACE; CAREERS;
D O I
10.1177/0001839217726545
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine how different occupational communities that are embedded in organizations exercise control processes to achieve emergent coordination as they create complex products together. We compare two types of organizations, equipment manufacturing and film production, and find that although occupational control was important for emergent coordination in both settings, this relationship varied according to two aspects of occupational embeddedness: organizational acknowledgment of occupational control and occupational interdependence. In the equipment manufacturing setting, occupational control was latent: the communities visibly conformed to organizational control processes while exercising occupational control behind the scenes to coordinate emergently. In the film setting, the organization granted the occupational community significant latitude over its tasks, which enabled members to coordinate emergently to solve problems the majority of the time. We propose that these two aspects of occupational embeddedness must be analyzed together with occupational control processes to explain how integration unfolds in knowledge-based settings in ways that organizational control processes are ill-equipped to manage.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 636
页数:30
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   STATUS AND STATUS STRAIN IN THE PROFESSIONS [J].
ABBOTT, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1981, 86 (04) :819-835
[2]  
Abbott Andrew., 1988, The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, DOI [10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001, DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226189666.001.0001]
[3]   Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive [J].
Adler, PS ;
Borys, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :61-89
[4]  
Alvesson M., 1995, MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE
[5]  
[Anonymous], OCC OUTL HDB 2010 20
[6]  
Barley S.R., 1991, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, V8, P1
[8]  
Bechky B.A., 2016, Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research: Innovative Pathways and Methods, P168
[9]   Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations [J].
Bechky, BA .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (01) :3-21
[10]   Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction [J].
Bechky, BA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2003, 109 (03) :720-752