Adhesive Precoated Bracket: Is It Worth Using? Long-term Shear Bond Strength: An In Vitro Study

被引:4
作者
Vorachart, Weerada [1 ]
Sombuntham, Nonglak [1 ]
Parakonthun, Kulthida [1 ]
机构
[1] Srinakharinwirot Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pedodont & Prevent Dent, Orthodont Div, Bangkok 10110, Thailand
关键词
orthodontic adhesive; adhesive precoated bracket; APC flash-free; shear bond strength; thermal cycling; DURATION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1740224
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives The objectives of this study were to compare the long-term shear bond strength of conventional adhesive on metal brackets with that of adhesive precoated brackets in vitro and to evaluate the amount of adhesive remnant on the tooth surface after debonding. Materials and Methods A total of 90 maxillary permanent premolars were randomly divided into two groups. The samples in the first group were bonded with metal brackets using Transbond PLUS Color Change Adhesive (TP), and the samples in the second group were bonded with Flash-Free adhesive precoated brackets (APC FF). The bonding techniques were performed, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The samples from each group were randomly divided into three subgroups with different thermal cycles (n = 15). The shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were measured and calculated. Statistical Analysis Two-way ANOVA and Chi-square test were used to analyze the differences in the SBS and ARI between the groups, respectively. Results The means of the SBS of the APC FF subgroups were significantly lower than those of the TP subgroups, except in the 10,000 thermocycle subgroups. Chi-square test showed no statistically significant differences between the groups and subgroups. An ARI score of 1 was the predominant score in both groups. Conclusions This study found that the SBS of APC FF gradually increased with time and thermal aging did not affect the failure pattern.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 847
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Ahmed Tamzid, 2018, Eur J Dent, V12, P602, DOI 10.4103/ejd.ejd_22_18
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Standardization IOf ISO 11405:2015
[3]   Shear Bond Strength of Ceramic Brackets with Different Base Designs: Comparative In-vitro Study [J].
Ansari, Mohd. Younus ;
Agarwal, Deepak K. ;
Gupta, Ankur ;
Bhattacharyaya, Preeti ;
Ansar, Juhi ;
Bhandari, Ravi .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (11) :ZC64-ZC68
[4]   CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH CRYSTAL-GROWTH CONDITIONING AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO ACID-ETCH ENAMEL PRETREATMENT [J].
ARTUN, J ;
BERGLAND, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1984, 85 (04) :333-340
[5]   An evaluation of factors affecting duration of orthodontic treatment [J].
Beckwith, FR ;
Ackerman, RJ ;
Cobb, CM ;
Tira, DE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1999, 115 (04) :439-447
[6]   Orthodontic bonding with self-etching primer and self-adhesive systems [J].
Chu, Chi Hung ;
Ou, Ken Liang ;
Dong, De Rei ;
Huang, Haw Ming ;
Tsai, Hung Huey ;
Wang, Wei Nan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 33 (03) :276-281
[7]  
Dardengo Camila de S., 2016, Dental Press J. Orthod., V21, P54
[8]  
Dheyaa A, 2018, INT J MED RES HEALTH, V7, P46
[9]   Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations [J].
Gale, MS ;
Darvell, BW .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1999, 27 (02) :89-99
[10]   The evolution of bonding in orthodontics [J].
Gange, Paul .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 147 (04) :S56-S63