Integrating Intra- and Interindividual Phenomena in Psychological Theories

被引:5
作者
Borsboom, Denny [1 ]
Haslbeck, Jonas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol Methods, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Clin Psychol Sci, Maastricht, Netherlands
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
Individual differences; intra-individual processes; ergodicity; formal theory; CRITICAL SLOWING-DOWN; GENERAL INTELLIGENCE; DIFFUSION-MODEL; TIME-SERIES; SELF-REPORT; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1080/00273171.2024.2336178
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Psychological science is divided into two distinct methodological traditions. One tradition seeks to understand how people function at the individual level, while the other seeks to understand how people differ from each other. Methodologies that have grown out of these traditions typically rely on different sources of data. While both use statistical models to understand the structure of the data, and these models are often similar, Molenaar (2004) showed that results from one type of analysis rarely transfer to the other, unless unrealistic assumptions hold. This raises the question how we may integrate these approaches. In this paper, we argue that formalized theories can be used to connect intra- and interindividual levels of analysis. This connection is indirect, in the sense that the relationship between theory and data is best understood through the intermediate level of phenomena: robust statistical patterns in empirical data. To illustrate this, we introduce a distinction between intra- and interindividual phenomena, and argue that many psychological theories will have implications for both types of phenomena. Formalization provides us with a methodological tool for investigating what kinds of intra- and interindividual phenomena we should expect to find if the theory under consideration were true.
引用
收藏
页码:1290 / 1309
页数:20
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Measurement invariance within and between individuals: a distinct problem in testing the equivalence of intra- and inter-individual model structures
    Adolf, Janne
    Schuurman, Noemi K.
    Borkenau, Peter
    Borsboom, Denny
    Dolan, Conor V.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [2] Alegria M., 2007, Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES), 2001-2003 (Version ICPSR20240-va)
  • [3] American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®), V5th Edition., DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
  • [4] ACT - A simple theory of complex cognition
    Anderson, JR
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1996, 51 (04) : 355 - 365
  • [5] Word-Object Learning via Visual Exploration in Space (WOLVES): A Neural Process Model of Cross-Situational Word Learning
    Bhat, Ajaz A.
    Spencer, John P.
    Samuelson, Larissa K.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2022, 129 (04) : 640 - 695
  • [6] SAVING THE PHENOMENA
    BOGEN, J
    WOODWARD, J
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1988, 97 (03) : 303 - 352
  • [7] Borsboom D., 2009, DEVELOPMENTAL PROCES
  • [8] Systems-based approaches to mental disorders are the only game in town
    Borsboom, Denny
    Haslbeck, Jonas M. B.
    Robinaugh, Donald J.
    [J]. WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 21 (03) : 420 - 422
  • [9] Theory Construction Methodology: A Practical Framework for Building Theories in Psychology
    Borsboom, Denny
    van der Maas, Han L. J.
    Dalege, Jonas
    Kievit, Rogier A.
    Haig, Brian D.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (04) : 756 - 766
  • [10] Can We Jump from Cross-Sectional to Dynamic Interpretations of Networks? Implications for the Network Perspective in Psychiatry
    Bos, Fionneke M.
    Snippe, Evelien
    de Vos, Stijn
    Hartmann, Jessica A.
    Simons, Claudia J. P.
    van der Krieke, Lian
    de Jonge, Peter
    Wichers, Marieke
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2017, 86 (03) : 175 - 177