Effects of limit state data on constructing accurate surrogate models for structural reliability analyses

被引:9
作者
Doan, Nhu Son [1 ]
Dinh, Huu-Ba [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vietnam Maritime Univ, Fac Civil Engn, 484 Lach Tray Str, Haiphong City, Vietnam
[2] Van Lang Univ, Inst Computat Sci & Artificial Intelligence, Lab Computat Civil Engn, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Van Lang Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Sch Technol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
关键词
Limit state data; Monte Carlo simulation; Surrogate models; Machine learning techniques; Data -driven approach; RESPONSE-SURFACE METHOD; SUBSET SIMULATION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; KRIGING MODEL; REGRESSION; STABILITY; SLOPES;
D O I
10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103595
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Engineering problems are mainly defined in implicit processes; hence, the fully probabilistic analyses, e.g., Monte Carlo simulations (MCS), are expensive to implement. In practice, two approaches to overcome the issues are either reducing the size of simulations or developing surrogate models for actual problems. The latter does not sacrifice the size of MCS and requires less insight into probabilistic calculation; hence, it is preferable to most engineers. This study proposes an efficient framework to develop reliable and accurate surrogate models by considering data at the limit state margins (LS data). Effects of involving LS data in the training process and performances of the proposed metamodels are investigated for most issues relating to reliability analyses, including nonlinear performance functions, multiple failure modes, and implicitly defined problems. Two machine learning algorithms, including artificial neural networks and the Gaussian process, are employed to prove the ability of the proposed method. Investigations reveal that the limit state data plays a vital role in developing accurate surrogate models for reliability analyses, and accumulating them into the training dataset helps quickly construct accurate metamodels. This work contributes a practical framework for reliability analyses because the LS data can be detected easily without insight into probabilistic calculations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Application of subset simulation methods to reliability benchmark problems [J].
Au, S. K. ;
Ching, J. ;
Beck, J. L. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2007, 29 (03) :183-193
[2]  
Beale M.H., 2012, Neural network toolboxuser's guide
[3]   Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions [J].
Bichon, B. J. ;
Eldred, M. S. ;
Swiler, L. P. ;
Mahadevan, S. ;
McFarland, J. M. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2008, 46 (10) :2459-2468
[4]   Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes [J].
Bichon, Barron J. ;
McFarland, John M. ;
Mahadevan, Sankaran .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (10) :1386-1395
[5]   A new artificial neural network-based response surface method for structural reliability analysis [J].
Cheng, Jin ;
Li, Q. S. ;
Xiao, Ru-Cheng .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2008, 23 (01) :51-63
[6]   Efficient Evaluation of Reliability for Slopes with Circular Slip Surfaces Using Importance Sampling [J].
Ching, Jianye ;
Phoon, Kok-Kwang ;
Hu, Yu-Gang .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 135 (06) :768-777
[7]   Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance function using radial basis function network [J].
Deng, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2006, 43 (11-12) :3255-3291
[8]   An efficient variable selection-based Kriging model method for the reliability analysis of slopes with spatially variable soils [J].
Ding, Jiayi ;
Zhou, Jianfang ;
Cai, Wei .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 235
[9]   Comparative study on semi-probabilistic design methods to calibrate load and resistance factors for sliding stability design of caisson breakwaters [J].
Dinh, Huu-Ba ;
Mac, Van Ha ;
Doan, Nhu Son .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2024, 293
[10]  
Doan NS, 2023, Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering (JSTCE) - HUCE, V17, P111, DOI [10.31814/stce.nuce2023-17(1)-09, 10.31814/stce.nuce2023-17(1)-09, DOI 10.31814/STCE.NUCE2023-17(1)-09]