The Output Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Speech Perception in Noise: The Effect of Multichannel and Free-Channel Hearing Aids

被引:0
作者
Dhrruvakumar, Shubhaganga [1 ]
Kooknoor, Vishal [2 ]
Veerabhadrappa, Rakesh Chowkalli [1 ]
机构
[1] Manipal Acad Higher Educ, Manipal Coll Hlth Profess, Dept Speech & Hearing, Manipal, India
[2] Jagadguru Sri Shivarathreeshwara Inst Speech & Hea, Dept Audiol, Mysore, India
来源
AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH | 2024年 / 33卷 / 03期
关键词
Channel-free hearing aids; multi-channel hearing aids; sensorineural hearing loss; speech recognition; AMPLITUDE-COMPRESSION; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.18502/avr.v33i3.15507
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: The output Signal -to -Noise Ratio (SNR) is one of the essential factors in hearing aid benefits. There is limited evidence regarding SNR improvement by the Channel -Free (CFHA) and Multi -Channel Hearing Aid (MCHA) and the speech understanding in noise through them. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which output SNR was modified by CFHA and MCHA processing and the variation in aided speech recognition abilities with a change in output SNR. Methods: Thirty-six participants aged 50-65 years were included. A chosen CFHA and MCHA were used to obtain the output SNR and sentence recognition in noise in four different processing algorithms (linear, linear+noise reduction, WDRC, WDRC+noise reduction). Hagerman's phase inversion technique was used to measure the attenuation of noise and, in turn, to obtain the output SNR of the hearing aid. Results: In all hearing aid processing algorithms among those with normal hearing and people with hearing loss, the output of CFHA revealed higher attenuation values than that of MCHA. There was a significant effect of the hearing aids and processing algorithms in both normal and individuals with hearing impairment on the mean SNR. Further, multiple linear regression analysis results showed that whether the hearing is channel -free or multichannel significantly predicted speech recognition scores, while output SNR and processing algorithms did not. Conclusion: The signal processing algorithms in CFHA had greater noise attenuation values, better output SNR, and speech recognition scores, showing an advantage over the modern MCHA among individuals with hearing impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 262
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]   Output signal-to-noise ratio and speech perception in noise: effects of algorithm [J].
Miller, Christi W. ;
Bentler, Ruth A. ;
Wu, Yu-Hsiang ;
Lewis, James ;
Tremblay, Kelly .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2017, 56 (08) :568-579
[12]  
MOORE BCJ, 1990, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, P250
[13]   Long-Term Signal-to-Noise Ratio at the Input and Output of Amplitude-Compression Systems [J].
Naylor, Graham ;
Johannesson, Rene Burmand .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2009, 20 (03) :161-171
[14]   THE NEGATIVE EFFECT OF AMPLITUDE COMPRESSION IN MULTICHANNEL HEARING-AIDS IN THE LIGHT OF THE MODULATION-TRANSFER FUNCTION [J].
PLOMP, R .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1988, 83 (06) :2322-2327
[15]   Comparison of Multichannel Wide Dynamic Range Compression and Channel Free Processing in Open Canal Hearing Instruments [J].
Plyler, Patrick N. ;
Reber, Monika Bertges ;
Kovach, Amanda ;
Galloway, Elisabeth ;
Humphrey, Elizabeth .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2013, 24 (02) :126-137
[16]   Effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition with variants of a multichannel adaptive dynamic range compression scheme [J].
Rallapalli, Varsha H. ;
Alexander, Joshua M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2019, 58 (10) :661-669
[17]  
Schaub A., 2008, Digital Hearing Aids
[18]   Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios [J].
Smeds, Karolina ;
Wolters, Florian ;
Rung, Martin .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (02) :183-196
[19]   Measuring the acoustic effects of compression amplification on speech in noise (L) [J].
Souza, PE ;
Jenstad, LM ;
Boike, KT .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2006, 119 (01) :41-44
[20]  
Tremblay K L, 2014, Int J Otolaryngol, V2014, P518967, DOI 10.1155/2014/518967