The Output Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Speech Perception in Noise: The Effect of Multichannel and Free-Channel Hearing Aids

被引:0
作者
Dhrruvakumar, Shubhaganga [1 ]
Kooknoor, Vishal [2 ]
Veerabhadrappa, Rakesh Chowkalli [1 ]
机构
[1] Manipal Acad Higher Educ, Manipal Coll Hlth Profess, Dept Speech & Hearing, Manipal, India
[2] Jagadguru Sri Shivarathreeshwara Inst Speech & Hea, Dept Audiol, Mysore, India
来源
AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH | 2024年 / 33卷 / 03期
关键词
Channel-free hearing aids; multi-channel hearing aids; sensorineural hearing loss; speech recognition; AMPLITUDE-COMPRESSION; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.18502/avr.v33i3.15507
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: The output Signal -to -Noise Ratio (SNR) is one of the essential factors in hearing aid benefits. There is limited evidence regarding SNR improvement by the Channel -Free (CFHA) and Multi -Channel Hearing Aid (MCHA) and the speech understanding in noise through them. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which output SNR was modified by CFHA and MCHA processing and the variation in aided speech recognition abilities with a change in output SNR. Methods: Thirty-six participants aged 50-65 years were included. A chosen CFHA and MCHA were used to obtain the output SNR and sentence recognition in noise in four different processing algorithms (linear, linear+noise reduction, WDRC, WDRC+noise reduction). Hagerman's phase inversion technique was used to measure the attenuation of noise and, in turn, to obtain the output SNR of the hearing aid. Results: In all hearing aid processing algorithms among those with normal hearing and people with hearing loss, the output of CFHA revealed higher attenuation values than that of MCHA. There was a significant effect of the hearing aids and processing algorithms in both normal and individuals with hearing impairment on the mean SNR. Further, multiple linear regression analysis results showed that whether the hearing is channel -free or multichannel significantly predicted speech recognition scores, while output SNR and processing algorithms did not. Conclusion: The signal processing algorithms in CFHA had greater noise attenuation values, better output SNR, and speech recognition scores, showing an advantage over the modern MCHA among individuals with hearing impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 262
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Boymans M, 2000, AUDIOLOGY, V39, P260
[2]   Acoustical and Perceptual Comparison of Noise Reduction and Compression in Hearing Aids [J].
Brons, Inge ;
Houben, Rolph ;
Dreschler, Wouter A. .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2015, 58 (04) :1363-1376
[3]  
DeSilva MDK, 2016, INT J HLTH SCI RES I, V6, P248
[4]  
Dillon H., 2008, Hearing aids
[5]  
Geetha C., 2014, J HEAR SCI, V4, P18, DOI [DOI 10.17430/890267, 10.17430/890267]
[6]  
Hagerman B, 2004, ACTA ACUST UNITED AC, V90, P356
[7]  
Hartling C, 2012, AM AUD SOC C SCOTTSD
[8]   Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility [J].
Jenstad, LM ;
Souza, PE .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2005, 48 (03) :651-667
[9]   The Effect of Multichannel and Channel-Free Hearing Aids on Spectral-Temporal Resolution and Speech Understanding in Noise [J].
Kilic, Mert ;
Kara, Eyyup .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (05) :285-292
[10]  
Kodiyath GK, 2017, INDIAN J OTOL, V23, P21, DOI 10.4103/0971-7749.199506