Comparison of Ankle Fracture Fixation Using Intramedullary Fibular Nailing Versus Plate Fixation

Ankle fracture fixation using intramedullary fibular (IMF) nails has been shown to allow for earlier weightbearing, reduced wound complications, better union rates, and the absence of prominent hardware, compared to plates/ screw (PS) constructs. The purpose of present retrospective cohort study was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent ankle fracture fixation using an IMF nail versus PS. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were recorded for patients who underwent ankle fracture fixation between May 2020 and May 2022, and who were at least 1 year postoperative. Toe-touch weightbearing was permitted immediately after surgery, protected weightbearing (PWB) at postoperative week 2, and weightbearing as tolerated in a brace at week 6. Radiographs were assessed preoperatively, and at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 weeks postoperative. Sixty-one ankle fractures (30 IMF, 31 PS) with a mean follow up of 14.7 and 18 (range, 12 to 23) months were included. Overall, the IMF nail cohort had less pain, faster time to union (11.4 vs 13.2 weeks), and less complications (23% vs 45%), reoperations (10% vs 16%), and surgical failures (9% vs 9.7%), compared to the PS cohort. The differences were not statistically significant. The PS cohort had a higher rate of symptomatic hardware irritation (p =< .001). Tobacco use adversely effected direct osseous healing (p < .001) and increased postoperative complications (p = .050). The present study lends credence to the previously reported advantages of IMF nailing over PS fixation for ankle fractures. Ankle fracture fixation using a fourth generation, IMF nail is a viable alternative to traditional PS fixation. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.