Bilateral Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator (SGAP) Flap: Modified Concept in Perineal Reconstruction

被引:0
作者
Zaussinger, Maximilian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pommer, Gabriele [1 ]
Freller, Katrin [1 ]
Schmidt, Manfred [1 ,2 ]
Huemer, Georg M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kepler Univ Hosp, Sect Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Krankenhausstr 9, A-4020 Linz, Austria
[2] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Med Fac, Altenbergerstr 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
[3] Paracelsus Med Univ, Doctoral Degree Program Med Sci, Strubergasse 21, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
关键词
superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap; perineal reconstruction; perforator flap; abdominoperineal excision; PELVIC FLOOR RECONSTRUCTION; ABDOMINIS MYOCUTANEOUS FLAP; ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; GRACILIS; EXCISION; OUTCOMES; CLOSURE; CANCER;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13133825
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision often requires complex closures and is fraught with wound healing complications. Flap-based approaches introduce non-irradiated vascularized tissue to the area of resection to fill a large soft-tissue defect and dead space, reduce the risk of infection, and facilitate wound healing. Employing perforator flaps with their beneficial donor site properties, the authors have developed a concept of bilateral superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flaps to restore extensive perineal defects. Methods: This retrospective case series was conducted between September 2015 and December 2019. We included three patients who received bilateral SGAP flap reconstruction after oncological resection. One deepithelialized SGAP flap was used for obliteration of dead space, combined with the contralateral SGAP flap for superficial defect reconstruction and wound closure. Results: Within this patient population, two male and one female patient, with a median age of 62 years (range, 52-76 years), were included. Six pedicled SGAP flaps were performed with average flap dimensions of 9 x 20 cm (range 7-9 x 19 x 21). No flap loss or no local recurrence were documented. In one case, partial tip necrosis with prolonged serous drainage was observed, which was managed by surgical debridement. No further complications were detected. Conclusions: The combination of two SGAP flaps provides maximal soft tissue for defect reconstruction and obliteration of dead space, while maintaining a very inconspicuous donor site, even with bilateral harvesting. Given these advantages, the authors recommend this promising approach for successful reconstruction of perineal defects.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Mesh safety in pelvic surgery: Our experience and outcome of biological mesh used in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy
    Tsiaousidou, Anastasia
    MacDonald, Linda
    Shalli, Kawan
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 10 (03) : 891 - 898
  • [22] Outcomes and Reliability of Perforator Flaps in the Reconstruction of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Defects: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Vaillant, Camille
    Berkane, Yanis
    Lupon, Elise
    Atlan, Michael
    Rousseau, Pascal
    Lellouch, Alexandre G.
    Duisit, Jerome
    Bertheuil, Nicolas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (19)
  • [23] Perineal Flap Reconstruction following Oncologic Anorectal Extirpation: An Outcomes Assessment
    Wang, Eric D.
    Conkling, Nicole
    Xu, Xiaoti
    Chern, Hueylan
    Finlayson, Emily
    Varma, Madhulika G.
    Hansen, Scott L.
    Foster, Robert D.
    Hoffman, William Y.
    Sbitany, Hani
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (01) : 176E - 184E
  • [24] The Versatility of the Fasciocutaneous Infragluteal (FCI) Flaps for locoregional or free flap reconstruction
    Zaussinger, Maximilian
    Wenny, Raphael
    Huemer, Georg M.
    Schmidt, Manfred
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (08) : 2493 - 2500
  • [25] A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Vascular Basis of the Transverse Myocutaneous Gracilis, Profunda Artery Perforator, and Fasciocutaneous Infragluteal Flaps: An Anatomical Study
    Zaussinger, Maximilian
    Tinhofer, Ines E.
    Hamscha, Ulrike
    Meng, Stefan
    Weninger, Wolfgang J.
    Pollhammer, Michael S.
    Huemer, Georg M.
    Schmidt, Manfred
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (02) : 381 - 390