Does the crown-implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant-supported prostheses? A systematic review

被引:9
作者
Fathi, Amirhossein [1 ]
Rismanchian, Mansour [1 ]
Khodadadi, Reza [1 ]
Dezaki, Sara Nasrollahi [2 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Dent Mat Res Ctr, Sch Dent, Dent Prosthodont Dept, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Dent Students Res Comm, Sch Dent, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
FIXED PARTIAL DENTURES; MARGINAL BONE-RESORPTION; LIFE TABLE ANALYSIS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ORAL IMPLANTS; OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS; TECHNICAL COMPLICATIONS; BIOMECHANICAL ASPECTS; CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE; ITI IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.007
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. The use of dental implants shorter than 10 mm in length increases the crown-implant ratio. Whether an increased crown-implant ratio affects the survival rate and complications is unclear. Purpose. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the effect of the crown-implant ratio on the survival rate and complications of implant-supported prostheses Materials and methods. Five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane) were electronically and manually searched for longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of 3 years or longer. The study question was "Does the crown-implant ratio affect survival rate and complications of implant-supported prostheses?" The outcomes investigated were implant survival rate, peri-implant bone resorption rate, implant fracture rate, and other technical complications in the implant components. Results. A total of 670 studies were identified from the research in the databases. By applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria to the full texts, 17 articles were included for descriptive analysis. Qualitative data analysis showed that the survival rate of implant-supported prostheses with a crown-implant ratio greater than 2 was 97.2%, and for a ratio lower than 1, it was about 97.6%. Moreover, 9 papers reported that increasing the crown-implant ratio reduced bone resorption, while 8 other studies reported no significant association between the increase in the crownimplant ratio and bone resorption. Conclusions. No significant relationship was found between the crown-implant ratio and implant survival rate. However, increasing the crown-implant ratio is likely to decrease bone loss around the implant. Information was insufficient to analyze the relationship between the crown-implant ratio and technical complications in implant-supported prostheses. (J Prosthet Dent 2024;131:819-25)
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 825
页数:7
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Retrospective Study of Short and Extra-Short Implants Placed in Posterior Regions: Influence of Crown-to-Implant Ratio on Marginal Bone Loss [J].
Anitua, Eduardo ;
Pinas, Laura ;
Orive, Gorka .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (01) :102-110
[2]  
Barbier L, 1997, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V12, P215
[3]   A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years [J].
Berglundh, T ;
Persson, L ;
Klinge, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2002, 29 :197-212
[4]   Crown-to-Implant Ratios of Short-Length Implants [J].
Birdi, Hardeep ;
Schulte, John ;
Kovacs, Alejandro ;
Weed, Meghan ;
Chuang, Sung-Kiang .
JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2010, 36 (06) :425-433
[5]   A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss [J].
Blanes, Rafael Juan ;
Bernard, Jean Pierre ;
Blanes, Zulema Maria ;
Belser, Urs Christoph .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2007, 18 (06) :707-714
[6]   Technical and biological complications/failures with single crowns and fixed partial dentures on implants:: a 10-year prospective cohort study [J].
Brägger, U ;
Karoussis, I ;
Persson, R ;
Pjetursson, B ;
Salvi, G ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2005, 16 (03) :326-334
[7]  
Broggini N., 2007, Glossary of oral and maxillofacial implants, P40
[8]   SUBMERGED ALUMINA DENTAL ROOT IMPLANTS IN HUMANS - 5-YEAR EVALUATION [J].
BROSE, MO ;
AVERS, RJ ;
RIEGER, MR ;
DUCKWORTH, JE .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1989, 61 (05) :595-601
[9]  
Brunski J B, 1999, Adv Dent Res, V13, P99
[10]   Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants .1. 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants [J].
Buser, D ;
MericskeStern, R ;
Bernard, JP ;
Behneke, A ;
Behneke, N ;
Hirt, HP ;
Belser, UC ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (03) :161-172