Auditory-perceptual Assessment of Healthy and Disordered Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale

被引:0
作者
Contreras-Ruston, Francisco [1 ,2 ]
Guzman, Marco [3 ]
Castillo-Allendes, Adrian [4 ]
Cantor-Cutiva, Lady [5 ,6 ]
Behlau, Mara [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valparaiso, Speech Language Pathol & Audiol Dept, La Troya Sin Numero, San Felipe, Chile
[2] Univ Barcelona, Dept Cognit, Parlab Percept Attent & Representat Lab, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Andes, Santiago, Chile
[4] Michigan State Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, E Lansing, MI USA
[5] Univ Nacl Colombia, Dept Collect Hlth, Bogota, Colombia
[6] Univ Manuela Beltran, Program Speech Language Pathol, Bogota, Colombia
[7] CEV Ctr Estudos Voz, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[8] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista Med, Speech Language Pathol & Audiol Dept, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Auditory-perceptual; evaluation-Voice; assessment-Rating; scales-Vocal screening-Dysphonia; QUALITY; RELIABILITY; DYSPHONIA; GRBAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.10.017
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective. This study aims to (1) determine the cut-off values of the Global Severity of vocal deviation on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from the numerical scale ratings, and (2) identify the cut-off values according to different degrees of vocal deviation used by Voice-Specialized Speech-Language Pathologists (SLP). Study design. Prospective study. Methods. The auditory-perceptual assessment was performed by four SLPs using two protocols with different scales: the VAS and the 4-point numerical scale. Among the 211 voices analyzed, 147 corresponded to female participants, and 64 corresponded to males, plus 20% repeated voice samples. Participants were between 19 and 60 years. All of them were asked to count from 1 to 10 and were recorded in a sound-proof booth. For both protocols, the judges scored the overall severity. One SLP was excluded from the analysis due to inconsistency during the perceptual assessment. Results. For normal voice and mild deviations, overall severity cut-off score on the VAS was 21. For mild-moderate deviations, the cut-off was 55; and 81 points for moderate and severe deviations. The Area Under the Curve values correspond to 0.725, 0.905 and 0.851, respectively. Conclusions. Our results suggest that the VAS is a good instrument to be used during voice assessment performed by Chilean SLPs. However, it evidences possible differences in voice analysis perception with other cutoff scores performed in other countries, which can be compared to future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / 659
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   PERCEPTION OF HOARSENESS BY SEVERAL CLASSES OF LISTENERS [J].
ANDERS, LC ;
HOLLIEN, H ;
HURME, P ;
SONNINEN, A ;
WENDLER, J .
FOLIA PHONIATRICA, 1988, 40 (02) :91-100
[2]   SPEECH WAVE-FORM PERTURBATION ANALYSIS - A PERCEPTUAL ACOUSTICAL COMPARISON OF 7 MEASURES [J].
ASKENFELT, AG ;
HAMMARBERG, B .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1986, 29 (01) :50-64
[3]   Common practices of voice therapists in the evaluation of patients [J].
Behrman, A .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2005, 19 (03) :454-469
[4]   Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Cutoff Values of the Chilean Version of the Voice Symptom Scale: VoiSS [J].
Contreras, Francisco ;
Moreti, Felipe ;
Vivero, Martin ;
Malebran, Celina ;
Behlau, Mara .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2021, 35 (03) :498.e31-498.e38
[5]   The limits of agreement and the intraclass correlation coefficient may be inconsistent in the interpretation of agreement [J].
Costa-Santos, Cristina ;
Bernardes, Joao ;
Ayres-de-Campos, Diogo ;
Costa, Antonia ;
Costa, Celia .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (03) :264-269
[6]   The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V) [J].
de Almeida, Sancha C. ;
Mendes, Ana P. ;
Kempster, Gail B. .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2019, 33 (04) :582.e5-582.e13
[7]   A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques - Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) [J].
Dejonckere, PH ;
Bradley, P ;
Clemente, P ;
Cornut, G ;
Crevier-Buchman, L ;
Friedrich, G ;
Van de Heyning, P ;
Remacle, M ;
Woisard, V .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2001, 258 (02) :77-82
[8]   PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF DYSPHONIA - RELIABILITY AND RELEVANCE [J].
DEJONCKERE, PH ;
OBBENS, C ;
DEMOOR, GM ;
WIENEKE, GH .
FOLIA PHONIATRICA, 1993, 45 (02) :76-83
[9]   CONSISTENCY AND RELIABILITY OF VOICE QUALITY RATINGS FOR DIFFERENT TYPES OF SPEECH FRAGMENTS [J].
DEKROM, G .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1994, 37 (05) :985-1000
[10]   Does Knowledge of Medical Diagnosis Bias Auditory-Perceptual Judgments of Dysphonia? [J].
Eadie, Tanya ;
Sroka, Alicia ;
Wright, Derek R. ;
Merati, Albert .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2011, 25 (04) :420-429