Do Firms with Low Disability Risks Opt Out from Public to Private Insurance?

被引:2
|
作者
Hassink, Wolter H. J. [1 ,2 ]
Koning, Pierre [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zwinkels, Wim [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Sch Econ, Kriekenpitpl 21-22, NL-3584 EC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] IZA, Kriekenpitpl 21-22, NL-3584 EC Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Econ, De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Tinbergen Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Epsilon Res, Roodenburgerstr 22, NL-2313 HK Leiden, Netherlands
来源
B E JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY | 2018年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
public versus private insurance; disability insurance; opting out; longitudinal analyses; HEALTH-INSURANCE; SELECTION; MARKETS; INFORMATION; GERMANY;
D O I
10.1515/bejeap-2017-0022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the Netherlands, firms may opt out from public to private disability insurance (DI). Opponents of this "mixed market" for insurance argue that it may trigger a segmentation between firms with high risks with public insurance and low disability risks with private insurance. This article tests the importance of such risk segmentation, using administrative information on DI benefits and opting-out decisions of a panel of about 250,000 Dutch firms between 2007 and 2011. We find strong selection into private insurance of firms with low recent DI inflow rates and low current sickness rates. Accordingly, private insurers succeeded in attracting firms with low anticipated DI benefit costs in the first years to come. Our results also suggest that these effects are transitory that is, firms that opted out have DI risks that are not structurally lower.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条