Collaboration or competition? Interactions between floating and fixed-bottom offshore wind in Norway

被引:1
作者
Havinga, Hylke C. [1 ]
van der Loos, H. Z. Adriaan [1 ]
Steen, Markus [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] SINTEF, Porsgrunn, Norway
关键词
Floating and fixed -bottom offshore wind; Socio-technical transitions; Interaction; Resistance; Diversification; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION SYSTEMS; RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; FORMATIVE PHASES; NORWEGIAN OIL; NICHE; TRANSITIONS; STRATEGIES; DYNAMICS; RECONFIGURATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2024.100872
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Fixed-bottom offshore wind is exploited as a maturing technology in many European countries. Floating wind has impressive potential for deep waters but needs technological and market development. How these two partially related technologies interact remains unclear. We address the ambiguity of these interactions to investigate floating offshore wind's development. The interactions are divided into technological or market and can be negative (competition and resistance) or positive (collaboration and diversification). We analyze these interaction types through a case study of offshore wind in Norway. Many positive interactions were observed, including knowledge overlaps and infrastructure compatibilities. Negative interactions include competition about future space constraints at ports, labor availability, and resistance by incumbent wind turbine manufacturers. Further, market and technological interactions are mutually influential, creating important feedback loops. Technologies can no longer be simply categorized as 'niche' or 'regime', but rather 'niche-like' (emerging) and 'regime-like' (maturing); hence, both emergingemerging and emerging-maturing interactions occur.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Afewerki S, 2022, Gaining lead firm position in an emerging industry: A global production networks analysis of two Scandinavian energy firms in offshore wind power-Samson Afewerki, Markus Steen, DOI [10.1177/10245294221103072, DOI 10.1177/10245294221103072]
[2]   Configuring floating production networks: A case study of a new offshore wind technology across two oil and gas economies [J].
Afewerki, Samson ;
Karlsen, Asbjorn ;
MacKinnon, Danny .
NORSK GEOGRAFISK TIDSSKRIFT-NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 73 (01) :4-15
[3]   Multi-system dynamics and the speed of net-zero transitions: Identifying causal processes related to technologies, actors, and institutions [J].
Andersen, Allan Dahl ;
Geels, Frank W. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2023, 102
[4]   The innovation and industry dynamics of technology phase-out in sustainability transitions: Insights from diversifying petroleum technology suppliers in Norway [J].
Andersen, Allan Dahl ;
Gulbrandsen, Magnus .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 64
[5]   Multi-technology interaction in socio-technical transitions: How recent dynamics in HVDC technology can inform transition theories [J].
Andersen, Allan Dahl ;
Markard, Jochen .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 151
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Offshore Wind in Europe-Key Trends and Statistics 2019
[7]  
Arapogianni A, 2013, Deep water: The next step for offshore wind energy, P51
[8]  
Belardo Teresa, 2021, WHAT YOU NEED KNOW E
[9]   Measuring the duration of formative phases for energy technologies [J].
Bento, Nuno ;
Wilson, Charlie .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2016, 21 :95-112
[10]   Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Hekkert, Marko ;
Jacobsson, Staffan ;
Markard, Jochen ;
Sanden, Bjoern ;
Truffer, Bernhard .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2015, 16 :51-64