A Comparison of Bayesian Approximation Methods for Analyzing Large Spatial Skewed Data

被引:0
作者
Roy, Paritosh Kumar [1 ,2 ]
Schmidt, Alexandra M. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Occupat Hlth, 2001 McGill Coll Ave,Suite 1200, Montreal, PQ H3A 1G1, Canada
[2] Univ Dhaka, Inst Stat Res & Training, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Approximate Gaussian process; Large spatial data; Environmental data analysis; Hilbert space method; Nearest neighbor method; MODEL; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1007/s13253-024-00635-9
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Commonly, environmental processes are observed across different locations, and observations present skewed distributions. Recent proposals for analyzing data in their original scale, accommodating spatial structure and skewness, involve two independent Gaussian processes (GP). We focus on a skewed spatial process defined through a convolution of Gaussian and log Gaussian (GLGC) processes. Because of the inclusion of two GPs, the inference procedure quickly becomes challenging as the sample size increases. We aim to investigate how recently developed approximate GPs perform in modeling high-dimensional GLGC processes. Three methods are formulated based on the nearest neighbor (NN) and Hilbert space (HS) methods, and their performances are investigated in comparison with the exact inference using simulation studies. All the approximate methods yield results comparable to exact inference, but the HS-based method provides the fastest inference of moderate to very smooth processes. A hybrid approach incorporating NN and HS methods is preferred for faster inference with improved MCMC efficiency for a wiggly process.Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Resampling-Based Stochastic Approximation Method for Analysis of Large Geostatistical Data
    Liang, Faming
    Cheng, Yi Hen
    Song, Qifan
    Park, Jincheol
    Yang, Ping
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 108 (501) : 325 - 339
  • [22] Urban runoff modelling uncertainty: Comparison among Bayesian and pseudo-Bayesian methods
    Freni, Gabriele
    Mannina, Giorgio
    Viviani, Gaspare
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2009, 24 (09) : 1100 - 1111
  • [23] Bayesian and Non-Bayesian Risk Analysis and Assessment under Left-Skewed Insurance Data and a Novel Compound Reciprocal Rayleigh Extension
    Ibrahim, Mohamed
    Emam, Walid
    Tashkandy, Yusra
    Ali, M. Masoom
    Yousof, Haitham M.
    MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (07)
  • [24] Spatial Bayesian surveillance for small area case event data
    Rotejanaprasert, Chawarat
    Lawson, Andrew
    Bolick-Aldrich, Susan
    Hurley, Deborah
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (04) : 1101 - 1117
  • [25] Small area estimation for semicontinuous skewed spatial data: An application to the grape wine production in Tuscany
    Dreassi, Emanuela
    Petrucci, Alessandra
    Rocco, Emilia
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 56 (01) : 141 - 156
  • [26] Bayesian prediction of spatial data with non-ignorable missingness
    Zahmatkesh, Samira
    Mohammadzadeh, Mohsen
    STATISTICAL PAPERS, 2021, 62 (05) : 2247 - 2268
  • [27] Bayesian cluster geographically weighted regression for spatial heterogeneous data
    Draidi Areed, Wala
    Price, Aiden
    Thompson, Helen
    Hassan, Conor
    Malseed, Reid
    Mengersen, Kerrie
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 11 (06):
  • [28] A Review of Tree-Based Methods for Analyzing Survey Data
    Bhaduri, Diya
    Toth, Daniell
    Holan, Scott H.
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2025, 17 (01):
  • [29] A Comparison of Learning Rate Selection Methods in Generalized Bayesian Inference
    Wu, Pei-Shien
    Martin, Ryan
    BAYESIAN ANALYSIS, 2023, 18 (01): : 105 - 132
  • [30] Spatial subsemble estimator for large geostatistical data
    Barbian, Marcia H.
    Assuncao, Renato M.
    SPATIAL STATISTICS, 2017, 22 : 68 - 88