A Comparison of Bayesian Approximation Methods for Analyzing Large Spatial Skewed Data

被引:0
作者
Roy, Paritosh Kumar [1 ,2 ]
Schmidt, Alexandra M. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Occupat Hlth, 2001 McGill Coll Ave,Suite 1200, Montreal, PQ H3A 1G1, Canada
[2] Univ Dhaka, Inst Stat Res & Training, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Approximate Gaussian process; Large spatial data; Environmental data analysis; Hilbert space method; Nearest neighbor method; MODEL; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1007/s13253-024-00635-9
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Commonly, environmental processes are observed across different locations, and observations present skewed distributions. Recent proposals for analyzing data in their original scale, accommodating spatial structure and skewness, involve two independent Gaussian processes (GP). We focus on a skewed spatial process defined through a convolution of Gaussian and log Gaussian (GLGC) processes. Because of the inclusion of two GPs, the inference procedure quickly becomes challenging as the sample size increases. We aim to investigate how recently developed approximate GPs perform in modeling high-dimensional GLGC processes. Three methods are formulated based on the nearest neighbor (NN) and Hilbert space (HS) methods, and their performances are investigated in comparison with the exact inference using simulation studies. All the approximate methods yield results comparable to exact inference, but the HS-based method provides the fastest inference of moderate to very smooth processes. A hybrid approach incorporating NN and HS methods is preferred for faster inference with improved MCMC efficiency for a wiggly process.Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation [J].
Gneiting, Tilmann ;
Raftery, Adrian E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 102 (477) :359-378
[12]   A Case Study Competition Among Methods for Analyzing Large Spatial Data [J].
Heaton, Matthew J. ;
Datta, Abhirup ;
Finley, Andrew O. ;
Furrer, Reinhard ;
Guinness, Joseph ;
Guhaniyogi, Rajarshi ;
Gerber, Florian ;
Gramacy, Robert B. ;
Hammerling, Dorit ;
Katzfuss, Matthias ;
Lindgren, Finn ;
Nychka, Douglas W. ;
Sun, Furong ;
Zammit-Mangion, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, 2019, 24 (03) :398-425
[13]  
Higdon D., 2002, QUANTITATIVE METHODS, P37, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-0657-9_2
[14]   A Bayesian prediction using the skew Gaussian distribution [J].
Kim, HM ;
Mallick, BK .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2004, 120 (1-2) :85-101
[15]  
Lerch S, 2016, EGU GEN ASS C
[16]   An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach [J].
Lindgren, Finn ;
Rue, Havard ;
Lindstrom, Johan .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2011, 73 :423-498
[17]   A Skewed and Heavy-Tailed Latent Random Field Model for Spatial Extremes [J].
Mahmoudian, Behzad .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 2017, 26 (03) :658-670
[18]  
McElreath R, 2016, TEXT STAT SCI, pXI
[19]  
Minozzo M, 2012, CHIL J STAT, V3, P157
[20]   A Multiresolution Gaussian Process Model for the Analysis of Large Spatial Datasets [J].
Nychka, Douglas ;
Bandyopadhyay, Soutir ;
Hammerling, Dorit ;
Lindgren, Finn ;
Sain, Stephan .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 2015, 24 (02) :579-599