Prediction of Visual Acuity in Pseudophakic Cataract Population Based on Residual Refraction

被引:10
作者
Weisensee, Johannes [1 ]
Ringhofer, Otmar M. [2 ]
Langenbucher, Achim [1 ]
机构
[1] Saarland Univ, Dept Expt Ophthalmol, Kirrberger Str 100,Bldg 22, D-66424 Homburg, Saar, Germany
[2] Chiemsee Augentagesklin, Prien Am Chiemsee, Germany
关键词
Visual acuity; cataract surgery; refractive error; defocus equivalent; prediction model; ERROR;
D O I
10.1080/02713683.2024.2359981
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of the study was to design a simple, handy prediction for the effect of spherical and cylindrical refractive error on the visual acuity degradation at different distances and validate this model on a clinical dataset.MethodsThis study examined 70 eyes from 35 patients' post-cataract surgery with aberration-free intraocular lenses. Biometric and corneal data were analysed, and subjective refraction and visual acuity were evaluated by two experienced optometrists. The study computed the spherical equivalent (SEQ), and defocus equivalent via vector addition (DEQ vec), as the sum of absolute values (DEQ abs). Predictive models were developed using univariate regression, with confidence intervals (BCa 95%) calculated through non-parametric bootstrapping (10,000 cycles).ResultsVarious calculated equivalents included -0.44 D for spherical equivalent (SEQ), 0.70 D for defocus equivalent based on vector calculation (DEQ vec), and 0.89 D for defocus equivalent based on absolute values (DEQ abs). Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity averaged 0.07 logMAR and -0.04 logMAR, respectively. The absolute defocus equivalent (DEQ abs) exhibited the smallest confidence interval (BCa 95%) at 0.07.ConclusionThe defocus equivalent based on the addition of absolute values (DEQ abs) emerged as the most practical predictor for the described applications. Notably, it offers the advantage of easy calculability through a simple equation: VA loss = DEQ abs & sdot; 0.23. In 95% of cases, this predicted loss would have an accuracy of +/- 0.03 lines.
引用
收藏
页码:1054 / 1060
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Finite schematic eye models and their accuracy to in-vivo data
    Bakaraju, Ravi C.
    Ehrmann, Klaus
    Papas, Eric
    Ho, Arthur
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2008, 48 (16) : 1681 - 1694
  • [2] Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?
    Blanca, Maria J.
    Alarcon, Rafael
    Arnau, Jaume
    Bono, Roser
    Bendayan, Rebecca
    [J]. PSICOTHEMA, 2017, 29 (04) : 552 - 557
  • [3] Unaided Visual Acuity and Blur: A Simple Model
    Blendowske, Ralf
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2015, 92 (06) : E121 - E125
  • [4] Investigating target refraction advice provided to cataract surgery patients by UK optometrists and ophthalmologists
    Charlesworth, Emily
    Alderson, Alison J.
    Fylan, Fiona
    Armstrong, Richard A.
    Chandra, Aman
    Elliott, David B.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2022, 42 (03) : 440 - 453
  • [5] Visual Impact of Zernike and Seidel Forms of Monochromatic Aberrations
    Cheng, Xu
    Bradley, Arthur
    Ravikumar, Sowmya
    Thibos, Larry N.
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2010, 87 (05) : 300 - 312
  • [6] EFRON B, 1987, J AM STAT ASSOC, V82, P171, DOI 10.2307/2289144
  • [7] Phenomenological model of visual acuity
    Gomez-Pedrero, Jose A.
    Alonso, Jose
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2016, 21 (12)
  • [8] Biostatistics Series Module 3: Comparing Groups: Numerical Variables
    Hazra, Avijit
    Gogtay, Nithya
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2016, 61 (03) : 251 - 260
  • [9] Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes
    Heinrich, Sven P.
    Bach, Michael
    [J]. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 251 (09) : 2235 - 2241
  • [10] What Teachers Should Know About the Bootstrap: Resampling in the Undergraduate Statistics Curriculum
    Hesterberg, Tim C.
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2015, 69 (04) : 371 - 386