Applying Support Vector Machines with Different Kernel to Breast Cancer Diagnosis

被引:1
作者
Ahmed-Medjahed, Seyyid [1 ]
Boukhatem, Fatima [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Relizane, Relizane, Algeria
[2] Univ Djillali Liabes Sidi Bel Abbes, Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria
来源
COMPUTACION Y SISTEMAS | 2024年 / 28卷 / 02期
关键词
Support vector machine; kernel function; breast cancer; diagnosis; classification; sequential minimal optimization; SELECTION;
D O I
10.13053/CyS-28-2-4207
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The detection of breast cancer poses a significant challenge in the field of medicine. It represents the second type of the largest cases of cancer deaths in women. Several techniques have been found to solve the problem or make a better diagnosis. Recently, Support Vector Machine based systems are the most common and are considered a better diagnostic assistant in cancer detection research. The quality of the results generated depends on the choice of some parameters such as the kernel function and the model parameters. In this paper, we analyze and evaluate the performance of several kernel functions in the SVM algorithm. Experiments are conducted with different training -test phases generated by the holdout method and we used the WBCD (Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database) to analyze the results. The results are evaluated by using the following performances measures: classification accuracy rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. To validate the results obtained by these different kernel functions, we use different values for the kernel functions parameters and SVM model parameters and we record the optimal parameters values. Finally, we show that the Cauchy kernel and the Rational Quadratic kernel are identical and converge to the same value.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 667
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Support vector machines combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis
    Akay, Mehmet Fatih
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (02) : 3240 - 3247
  • [2] Albrecht AA, 2002, ICONIP'02: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, P184
  • [3] Brook A., 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
  • [4] CORTES C, 1995, MACH LEARN, V20, P273, DOI 10.1023/A:1022627411411
  • [5] Efficient SVM regression training with SMO
    Flake, GW
    Lawrence, S
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2002, 46 (1-3) : 271 - 290
  • [6] Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis
    Forouzanfar, Mohammad H.
    Foreman, Kyle J.
    Delossantos, Allyne M.
    Lozano, Rafael
    Lopez, Alan D.
    Murray, Christopher J. L.
    Naghavi, Mohsen
    [J]. LANCET, 2011, 378 (9801) : 1461 - 1484
  • [7] Guijarro-Berdiñas B, 2007, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4881, P365
  • [8] Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines
    Guyon, I
    Weston, J
    Barnhill, S
    Vapnik, V
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2002, 46 (1-3) : 389 - 422
  • [9] Hamilton H. J., 1996, Journal of Computer and System Science, V20, P34
  • [10] Improvements to Platt's SMO algorithm for SVM classifier design
    Keerthi, SS
    Shevade, SK
    Bhattacharyya, C
    Murthy, KRK
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2001, 13 (03) : 637 - 649