From Boundary Objects to Boundary Infrastructure: A Process Study of Collaboration between Big Science and Big Business

被引:1
作者
Hummel, Jochem T. [1 ,3 ]
Berends, Hans [2 ]
Tuertscher, Philipp [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick, England
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Warwick, England
关键词
boundary infrastructure; coalitions; interorganizational collaboration; process research; scaffolding; INTERORGANIZATIONAL COLLABORATION; KNOWLEDGE; ORGANIZATIONS; INNOVATION; DESIGN; IMPLEMENTATION; TRANSFORMATION; CHALLENGES; STRATEGIES; LEADERSHIP;
D O I
10.1111/joms.13118
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The development of a novel boundary infrastructure for large-scale interorganizational collaboration presents a challenge that is ill-understood: how can individual boundary objects, which do not suffice for large-scale collaboration and might even engender conflict, be developed into a coherent boundary infrastructure that facilitates the crossing of multiple boundaries? In a longitudinal study, we investigated how Helix Nebula - a collaboration among Europe's big science and big business organizations - developed a cloud computing infrastructure for scientific research. Our findings show that the process involves two recursive mechanisms. The scaffolding of boundary objects helps organizations to iteratively create various technical and organizational objects that support each other's development. The reconfiguring of coalitions involves organizations constantly rearranging into subgroups, which enables them to accommodate their differences and common needs. Our study contributes a process model of how organizations develop boundary objects into a coherent boundary infrastructure and shines light on the role of scaffolding and the political dynamics of coalitions as a driving force for large-scale interorganizational collaboration.
引用
收藏
页码:1644 / 1679
页数:36
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] Turbulent Stability of Emergent Roles: The Dualistic Nature of Self-Organizing Knowledge Coproduction
    Arazy, Ofer
    Daxenberger, Johannes
    Lifshitz-Assaf, Hila
    Nov, Oded
    Gurevych, Iryna
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (04) : 792 - 812
  • [2] COALITION-FORMATION IN STANDARD-SETTING ALLIANCES
    AXELROD, R
    MITCHELL, W
    THOMAS, RE
    BENNETT, DS
    BRUDERER, E
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1995, 41 (09) : 1493 - 1508
  • [3] Boundary object use in cross-cultural software development teams
    Barrett, Michael
    Oborn, Eivor
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 2010, 63 (08) : 1199 - 1221
  • [4] Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor
    Bechky, BA
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (03) : 312 - 330
  • [5] Composing qualitative process research
    Berends, Hans
    Deken, Fleur
    [J]. STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2021, 19 (01) : 134 - 146
  • [6] Using Visual Representations as Boundary Objects to Resolve Conflict in Collaborative Model-Building Approaches
    Black, Laura J.
    Andersen, David F.
    [J]. SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2012, 29 (02) : 194 - 208
  • [7] Hybrid Orchestration in Multi-stakeholder Innovation Networks: Practices of mobilizing multiple, diverse stakeholders across organizational boundaries
    Blazevic, Vera
    Reypens, Charlotte
    Lievens, Annouk
    [J]. ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2021, 42 (01) : 61 - 83
  • [8] Bowker G. C., 1999, SORTING THINGS OUT
  • [9] Bowker GC, 2010, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF INTERNET RESEARCH, P97, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-9789-8_5
  • [10] INTERORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS AS POLITICAL BATTLEFIELDS: HOW FRAGMENTATION WITHIN ORGANIZATIONS SHAPES RELATIONAL DYNAMICS BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONS
    Brattstrom, Anna
    Faems, Dries
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 63 (05) : 1591 - 1620