Environmental co-benefits of climate mitigation: Evidence from clean development mechanism projects in China

被引:4
作者
Wan, Panbing [1 ]
Zhang, Zhongxiang [2 ]
Chen, Lin [3 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Econ & Management Sch, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Ma Yinchu Sch Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Inst Ind Econ, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Climate mitigation; Clean development mechanism; Co-benefits; International climate cooperation; Technological progress; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER; EMISSION REDUCTION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; KYOTO PROTOCOL; PERFORMANCE; POLICY; CDM; PRODUCTIVITY; IMPACTS; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102182
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The carbon reduction effects of climate mitigation have received much attention, but less attention has been paid to the co-benefits of climate mitigation such as such as air pollution reduction and related health impacts. This oversight may have led to an underestimation of the broader welfare effects of climate mitigation and thus hindering its progress in implementation. This paper investigates the co-benefits of climate mitigation through focusing on the pollution reduction effects of the implementation of the clean development mechanism (CDM), which is an important climate mitigation mechanism to enhance north-south climate cooperation. Using a unique firm-level dataset with data on China's CDM projects from 1998 to 2012, we show that the CDM implementation reduced sulfur dioxide emissions. Mechanism analyses show that the CDM implementation alleviated firms' financing constraints and promoted fossil energy savings, thereby reducing emissions of air pollutants that usually coexist with greenhouse gases in burning fossil fuels. We also find that the CDM didn't bring about the expected technological progress. These results highlight environmental co-benefits of climate mitigation and provide important implications for international climate cooperation
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Aggarwal A, 2018, INNOV DEV, V8, P249, DOI [10.1080/2157930x.2017.1366967, 10.1080/2157930X.2017.1366967, DOI 10.1080/2157930X.2017.1366967]
[2]   How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? * [J].
Baker, Andrew C. ;
Larcker, David F. ;
Wang, Charles C. Y. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 144 (02) :370-395
[3]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[4]  
Borusyak K, 2024, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2108.12419, 10.48550/ARXIV.2108.12419, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2108.12419, 10.48550/arXiv.2108.12419]
[5]   Adopt or Innovate: Understanding Technological Responses to Cap-and-Trade [J].
Calel, Raphael .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2020, 12 (03) :170-201
[6]   Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods [J].
Callaway, Brantly ;
Sant'Anna, Pedro H. C. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2021, 225 (02) :200-230
[7]   When carbon emission trading meets a regulated industry: Evidence from the electricity sector of China [J].
Cao, Jing ;
Ho, Mun S. ;
Ma, Rong ;
Teng, Fei .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2021, 200
[8]   China's 11th Five-Year Plan and the Environment: Reducing SO2 Emissions [J].
Cao, Jing ;
Garbaccio, Richard ;
Ho, Mun S. .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2009, 3 (02) :231-250
[9]  
Capoor K., 2008, State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2008
[10]   THE EFFECT OF MINIMUM WAGES ON LOW-WAGE JOBS [J].
Cengiz, Doruk ;
Dube, Arindrajit ;
Lindner, Attila ;
Zipperer, Ben .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2019, 134 (03) :1405-1454