Dual Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Index for Corporate Sustainability Assessment Using Blockchain Technology

被引:4
作者
Liu, Xinlai [1 ]
Liang, Wenbiao [2 ]
Fu, Yelin [3 ]
Huang, George Q. [4 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Syst Engn, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[2] Nari Grp Co Ltd, Nanjing 210031, Peoples R China
[3] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Econ, Shenzhen 518000, Peoples R China
[4] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
dual ESG Index; blockchain; smart contract; crypto token; corporate sustainability assessment; SET;
D O I
10.3390/su16104272
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Investors are increasingly relying on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) indexes to obtain a third-party assessment of corporate sustainability performance. Various ESG indexes are, therefore, released by prominent rating agencies, including MSCI, Sustainalytics, Refinitiv, etc. However, existing ESG indexes overvalue the usage of massive ESG metrics while ignoring various ESG disclosure levels, leading to critical issues such as limited company coverage, inflexible ESG framework, and obscure assessment processes. This paper proposes a novel Dual ESG Index (DESGI) model using blockchain technology to provide a flexible and transparent corporate sustainability assessment. Firstly, the DESGI model is developed by analogy to the rationale and concepts of the academic credit system due to its advantages of scalability and flexibility. Secondly, blockchain is used to build a transparent environment for ESG assessment. Thirdly, the smart contract and crypto token, as the core blockchain constructs, are used to achieve the dual-dimensional ESG depth and width assessment using ESG GPA and ESG credit, respectively. Finally, a case study is carried out to validate the DESGI by using real-life ESG data and comparing it with four existing ESG indexes. Several managerial implications are also found: (1) DESGI can expand the scope of companies evaluated by ESG criteria regardless of company size or scale; (2) DESGI provides a good potential to fight against greenwashing through the blockchain-based traceability; (3) DESGI can identify the ESG elites who disclose fewer ESG metrics but with excellent ESG performances, which can hardly be achieved using traditional ESG indexes.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Determinants of Corporate Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting among Asian Firms [J].
Abdul Rahman, Rashidah ;
Alsayegh, Maha Faisal .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 (04)
[2]   A Quantitative Approach for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Corporations [J].
Ahi, Payman ;
Searcy, Cory ;
Jaber, Mohamad Y. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 152 :336-346
[3]  
Aithal P S., 2016, Int. J. Eng. Res. Mod. Educ, VI, P278, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.161046
[4]   The environmental, social, and governance (ESG) dimension of firms in which social responsible investment (SRI) and conventional pension funds invest: The mainstream SRI and the ESG inclusion [J].
Alda, Mercedes .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 298
[5]   Sustainability in Blockchain: A Systematic Literature Review on Scalability and Power Consumption Issues [J].
Alshahrani, Hani ;
Islam, Noman ;
Syed, Darakhshan ;
Sulaiman, Adel ;
Al Reshan, Mana Saleh ;
Rajab, Khairan ;
Shaikh, Asadullah ;
Shuja-Uddin, Jaweed ;
Soomro, Aadar .
ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (03)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2022, MSCI ESG ratings methodology
[8]   Examining the Quadratic Impact of Sovereign Environmental, Social, and Governance Practices on Firms' Profitability: New Insights from the Financial Industry in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries [J].
Athari, Seyed Alireza ;
Saliba, Chafic ;
Abboud, Elsa ;
El-Bayaa, Nourhan .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (07)
[9]  
Biswas S., 2018, Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev, V5, P1362
[10]  
Boffo R., 2020, ESG Investing: Practices, Progress and Challenges