Does Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance Improve Financial Institutions' Efficiency? Evidence from China

被引:2
作者
Wu, Zhiliang [1 ]
Chen, Shaowei [1 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Xian 710100, Peoples R China
关键词
environmental; social; and governance (ESG) performance; financial institutions' efficiency; downside risk; agency costs; RESPONSIBILITY; PROFITABILITY; INVESTMENT; ROBUST; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/math12091369
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Nowadays, the call for sustainable development is becoming stronger in all countries of the world, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, as a vivid practice of this concept, has gradually received extensive attention from enterprises and investors. Financial institutions have an important position in the national economy as an important tool for the state to regulate the macroeconomy. Whether ESG performance can improve financial institutions' efficiency is of key significance for boosting sustainable development. Based on data from China's listed financial institutions from 2015 to 2021, this study aims to investigate the impact of ESG performance on financial institutions. The robust nonparametric boundary model and fixed-effects model are employed for analysis. The empirical results demonstrate that ESG performance and its sub-indicators of environmental performance and social responsibility performance can significantly enhance financial institutions' efficiency. In particular, this effect is more pronounced in the securities industry and diversified financial industry, as well as in non-state and small-scale financial institutions. The results remain unchanged after a series of robustness tests. Furthermore, the mechanism tests indicate that ESG performance can enhance financial institutions' efficiency by reducing downside risk and agency costs.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Market structure, efficiency and profitability of insurance companies in Ghana [J].
Alhassan, Abdul Latif ;
Addisson, George Kojo ;
Asamoah, Michael Effah .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2015, 10 (04) :648-669
[2]   Agency costs and ownership structure [J].
Ang, JS ;
Cole, RA ;
Lin, JW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (01) :81-106
[3]  
Ari G., 2023, Reference module in social sciences, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-44-313776-1.00121-5, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-44-313776-1.00121-5]
[4]   ESG activities and banking performance: International evidence from emerging economies [J].
Azmi, Wajahat ;
Hassan, M. Kabir ;
Houston, Reza ;
Karim, Mohammad Sydul .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2021, 70
[5]   How to measure the impact of environmental factors in a nonparametric production model [J].
Badin, Luiza ;
Daraio, Cinzia ;
Simar, Leopold .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 223 (03) :818-833
[6]   ESG performance and investment efficiency: The impact of information asymmetry [J].
Bilyay-Erdogan, Seda ;
Danisman, Gamze Ozturk ;
Demir, Ender .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2024, 91
[7]   ESG and firm performance: The role of size and media channels [J].
Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, Emawtee ;
Brooks, Robert ;
Do, Hung Xuan .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2023, 121
[8]   How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching [J].
Black, DA ;
Smith, JA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2004, 121 (1-2) :99-124
[9]   Does Firm Size Matter for ESG Risk? Cross-Sectional Evidence from the Banking Industry [J].
Bolibok, Piotr M. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (02)
[10]   Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests [J].
Borghesi, Richard ;
Houston, Joel F. ;
Naranjo, Andy .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2014, 26 :164-181