Television Debates as a TV Typology: Continuities and Changes in Televised Political Competition-The Case of the 2023 Pre-Election Debates in Greece

被引:1
作者
Bourchas, Panagiotis Vasileios [1 ]
Gioltzidou, Georgia [2 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki AUTH, Sch Journalism & Mass Commun Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
[2] Hellen Open Univ HOU, Sch Social Sci, Patras 26335, Greece
来源
JOURNALISM AND MEDIA | 2024年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
political communication; television debates; social media; newspapers; journalism; PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE; TWITTER; IMPACT; MEDIA;
D O I
10.3390/journalmedia5020052
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
In the USA, for the first time in the 1960s, and in a very systematic manner from 1976 onwards, pre-election debates (televised presidential debates) have become a fundamental and integral method of communication for political parties, as well as an institution of American democracy that contributes significantly to shaping a culture of public political dialogue at a relatively high level, through which citizens accumulate knowledge about political figures and their parties' positions within a very short period of time before the elections. In Greece, on the contrary, these television programs have not sparked significant interest to date. The subject of this study is the television debates in Greece, evaluated through a brief historical overview and commentary on their structure, culminating in the two televised confrontations that took place within a five-month period during two electoral contests in 2023. Firstly, the reactions to and reception of the two televised debates by citizens on platform X and, secondly, the commentary on the two debates by journalists, columnists, and renowned analysts, reveal the differing interests of both sides. The research results confirm that, in addition to the performance of politicians, citizens are also interested in the conditions and form in which these pre-election televised debates are staged.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 813
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ARGUMENT ADVOCACY, V38, P199, DOI DOI 10.1080/00028533.2002.11821568
[2]   NATIONAL POLITICS ON TWITTER: Structures and topics of a networked public sphere [J].
Ausserhofer, Julian ;
Maireder, Axel .
INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2013, 16 (03) :291-314
[3]   A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing US presidential debates [J].
Benoit, WL ;
Hansen, GJ ;
Verser, RM .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 2003, 70 (04) :335-350
[4]   Presidential debate watching, issue knowledge, character evaluation, and vote choice [J].
Benoit, WL ;
Hansen, GJ .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2004, 30 (01) :121-144
[5]  
Blumler Jay., 2017, Debating the Debates
[6]  
How Voters Viewed the Question Time Special
[7]  
Bruns A., 2011, The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics
[8]   Tweeting to save the furniture: the 2013 Australian election campaign on Twitter [J].
Bruns, Axel .
MEDIA INTERNATIONAL AUSTRALIA, 2017, 162 (01) :49-64
[9]   PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES - ARE THEY HELPFUL TO VOTERS [J].
CHAFFEE, SH .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 1978, 45 (04) :330-346
[10]   WAVE-RIDING AND HASHTAG-JUMPING: Twitter, minority "third parties' and the 2012 US elections [J].
Christensen, Christian .
INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2013, 16 (05) :646-666