Effects of Sprint Interval Training Surface on Physical Fitness Attributes of Collegiate Female Soccer Players: Identifying Individual Responses to Training on Grass, Sand, and Land Surfaces

被引:1
作者
Zhang, Jun [1 ]
Wei, Aodong [1 ]
Xie, Chao [2 ]
机构
[1] Liaoning Normal Univ, 850 Huanghe Rd, Dalian 116029, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Univ Arts & Sci, 296 Longzhong Rd, Xiangyang 441053, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Interval training; team sport; aerobic capacity; athletic performance; HIGH-INTENSITY INTERVAL; INTERMITTENT RECOVERY TEST; ADAPTATIONS; PERFORMANCE; JUMP; KICKING; PROGRAM; POWER;
D O I
10.52082/jssm.2024.465
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
This study aimed to identify the optimal surface for sprint interval training to maximize transfer effects on physical performance measures on the grass pitch. Using a randomized controlled trial design, 40 collegiate female soccer players were equally assigned to three experimental groups performing short sprint interval training (SSIT: 4 sets of 10 repetitions with 5 seconds all -out running, with a 50-second recovery period between each effort and a 3-minute rest interval between sets) on SAND, GRASS, LAND, and a control group. Before and after a 7-week training period, participants underwent a series of field-based tests to evaluate countermovement jump (CMJ), 20-m linear sprint, Illinois change of direction (CoD) speed, Yo-Yo IR1, 2.4 km time trial, and maximal kicking distance (MKD) performance. A two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was conducted on the data, along with Bonferroni post hoc testing. After the intervention, the control group did not show any changes, while the SAND, GRASS and LAND training groups demonstrated improvements (p = 0.001) in their performance as follows: CMJ (effect size [ES] = 1.21, 0.97, 0.64), 20-m linear sprint (ES = -0.81, -0.55, -0.41), Illinois CoD (ES = -0.72, -0.79, -0.41), Yo-Yo IR1 (ES = 1.86, 1.19, 1.12), 2.4 km time trail (ES = -0.82, -0.62,0.49), and MKD (ES = 0.60, 0.90, 0.72), respectively. Comparative analysis of SAND, GRASS, and LAND revealed that performing SSIT on SAND results in a significantly greater gain in CMJ than LAND (p = 0.041). Analyzing individual responses to training interventions indicated that the training surface had a favorable influence on CMJ (SAND vs. LAND, p = 0.009), but on other variables no statistically significant (p > 0.05) differences were observed. Considering these findings, it is advised that strength and conditioning coaches use the SAND surface as the initial choice for SSIT sessions regarding greater gains (i.e., ES) in performance. This recommendation aims to facilitate more favorable transfer in physical fitness adaptation on a soccer grass pitch. In case of unavailability of SAND surface, GRASS surface would be a suitable alternative to enhance the physical fitness of collegiate female soccer players.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 474
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Arazi H, 2017, SPORTS, V5, DOI 10.3390/sports5030057
[2]   Type of Ground Surface during Plyometric Training Affects the Severity of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage [J].
Arazi, Hamid ;
Eston, Roger ;
Asadi, Abbas ;
Roozbeh, Behnam ;
Zarei, Alireza Saati .
SPORTS, 2016, 4 (01)
[3]   Muscular adaptations to depth jump plyometric training: Comparison of sand vs. land surface [J].
Arazi, Hamid ;
Mohammadi, Mahdi ;
Asadi, Abbas .
INTERVENTIONAL MEDICINE AND APPLIED SCIENCE, 2014, 6 (03) :125-130
[4]   Running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players [J].
Arslan, Ersan ;
Orer, Gamze Erikoglu ;
Clemente, Filipe Manuel .
BIOLOGY OF SPORT, 2020, 37 (02) :165-173
[5]   The effects of maturation on jumping ability and sprint adaptations to plyometric training in youth soccer players [J].
Asadi, Abbas ;
Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo ;
Arazi, Hamid ;
Saez de Villarreal, Eduardo .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2018, 36 (21) :2405-2411
[6]   Effects of a low-volume plyometric training in anaerobic performance of adolescent athletes [J].
Assuncao, Ari R. ;
Bottaro, Martim ;
Cardoso, Euler A. ;
Dantas da Silva, Daiane P. ;
Ferraz, Marcelo ;
Vieira, Carlos A. ;
Gentil, Paulo .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 2018, 58 (05) :570-575
[7]  
Ball K., 2009, SCI FOOTBALL, P285
[8]  
Barzegar H, 2022, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V62, P337, DOI [10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12125-5, 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12125]
[9]   High-Intensity 10-s Work: 5-s Recovery Intermittent Training Improves Anaerobic and Aerobic Performances [J].
Belfry, Glen R. ;
Paterson, Don H. ;
Thomas, Scott G. .
RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2020, 91 (04) :640-651
[10]   EFFECT OF TRAINING SURFACE ON ACUTE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES AFTER INTERVAL TRAINING [J].
Binnie, Martyn J. ;
Dawson, Brian ;
Pinnington, Hugh ;
Landers, Grant ;
Peeling, Peter .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2013, 27 (04) :1047-1056