Taxonomy of performance shaping factors in manufacturing: A systematic literature review

被引:1
作者
Jha, Prameet Ranjan [1 ]
Di Pasquale, Valentina [2 ]
Saleem, Jason J. [1 ]
Wang, Xiaomei [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Dept Ind Engn, 132 Eastern Pkwy, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Univ Salerno, Dept Ind Engn, Fisciano, Campania, Italy
关键词
human performance; human reliability; performance shaping factors; HUMAN RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; ERROR IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUES; INDUSTRY; 4.0; MAINTENANCE; MODEL; HRA; CLASSIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; ACCIDENTS;
D O I
10.1002/hfm.21036
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Human error in manufacturing can have substantial consequences, including loss of life, injuries, productivity, and financial losses. Human reliability analysis (HRA) methods can be used to evaluate the likelihood of human error in manufacturing tasks and identify potential sources of error. Performance shaping factors (PSFs) are internal and external factors that influence human performance and can affect the likelihood of human reliability estimates in HRA methods. Understanding the impact of PSFs on human performance in manufacturing is essential for developing effective strategies to minimize the likelihood of human error and improve the safety and efficiency of manufacturing processes. This systematic review scrutinizes the literature on PSFs within manufacturing, highlighting HRA applications. Using the PRISMA protocol, studies from 2000 to 2024 across engineering and psychology were examined, culminating in the analysis of 35 pertinent works. The review identifies and contrasts various PSF taxonomies from established HRA methods like SPAR-H, HEART, CREAM, and THERP, revealing their diverse applications in different manufacturing settings. The review also uncovers a tendency to devise taxonomies through the lens of experts' domain knowledge, particularly tailored to discrete manufacturing contexts. A critical gap is observed in the lack of a uniform PSF framework, with the current literature reflecting a disparate understanding of PSFs' roles, definitions, and interrelations. This absence is further pronounced by the inadequate integration of human factors in the dialogue surrounding Industry 4.0. The analysis points to the necessity of harmonizing PSFs to better assess human reliability amid technological integration. The findings emphasize the need for an industry-specific PSF framework that aligns with the intricacies of manufacturing operations, thus enabling more accurate HRA outcomes and informing strategies for error reduction and process optimization.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 385
页数:19
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Human reliability assessment (HRA) in maintenance of production process: a case study [J].
Aalipour M. ;
Ayele Y.Z. ;
Barabadi A. .
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2016, 7 (02) :229-238
[2]   Industry 4.0: The use of simulation for human reliability assessment [J].
Angelopoulou, Anastasia ;
Mykoniatis, Konstantinos ;
Boyapati, Nithisha Reddy .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRY 4.0 AND SMART MANUFACTURING (ISM 2019), 2020, 42 :296-301
[3]   Occupational health and safety in the industry 4.0 era: A cause for major concern? [J].
Badri, Adel ;
Boudreau-Trudel, Bryan ;
Souissi, Ahmed Saadeddine .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 109 :403-411
[4]  
Baldissone G., 2021, RISK ASSESSMENT MANU, P2654
[5]   Performance shaping factors in reliability analysis of design of offshore structures [J].
Bea, RG .
JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2000, 122 (03) :163-172
[6]  
Bell J, 2009, Health Safety Laboratory
[7]   Human performance breakdowns are rarely accidents: they are usually very poor choices with disastrous results [J].
Besco, RO .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2004, 115 (1-3) :155-161
[8]  
Boring R. L., 2010, How many performance shaping factors are necessary for human reliability analysis?
[9]  
Brauner P., 2016, On Studying Human Factors in Complex Cyber-Physical Systems: Gesellschaft fur Informatik e
[10]   Human reliability: A key to improved quality in manufacturing [J].
Bubb, H .
HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN MANUFACTURING, 2005, 15 (04) :353-368