Surgical treatment of pilonidal disease - Short-term follow up results of minimally invasive pit-picking surgery versus radical excision without suturing: A prospective randomised trial

被引:1
作者
Dainius, Edvinas [1 ]
Vaiciute, Monika Karolina [2 ]
Parseliunas, Audrius [1 ]
Latkauskas, Tadas [3 ]
Venskutonis, Donatas [1 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Josvainiu G 2, LT-47144 Kaunas, Lithuania
[2] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Kaunas, Lithuania
[3] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
SINUS DISEASE; KARYDAKIS FLAP; PHENOLIZATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; SOCIETY; TRACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31497
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: In this study we compared the potential benefits of surgical treatments for chronic symptomatic pilonidal disease (PD) - minimally invasive pit-picking surgery and radical excision without wound suturing. Materials and methods: A total of 100 adult patients with chronic symptomatic PD were enrolled in this study at the Kaunas Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. They were randomly divided into two groups: pit-picking surgery (n = 50) and radical excision with open healing (n = 50). Recurrent PD patients were not excluded. The comparison of the techniques was based on pain within the first postoperative week, failed surgery rates, and wound healing time. Additionally, pain levels at different time intervals following the treatment, analgesic consumption, and time off work, were assessed and compared. Results: A total of 89 patients (89 %) were available for follow-up after 6 months. Pain levels the first postoperative week were significantly lower in the pit-picking group compared to the radical excision group, with median scores of 10.0 and 20.0, respectively (p = 0.002). The complete wound healing time was longer in the radical excision group (60 days) versus the pit-picking group (17 days), with a significant difference noted (p = 0.00). No significant difference was observed between the type of surgery and the rate of failed surgery, with 5 (11.9 %) cases in the pit-picking group and 4 (8.5 %) in the radical excision group. Conclusion: Based on our short-term findings, minimally invasive pit-picking surgery is a better option regarding pain, wound healing time and failed surgery rate. In cases where this approach is not suitable, other alternatives should be contemplated, as radical surgery without wound suturing should not be employed as a treatment method for PD. Additionally, the relationship between PD and recurrence rates should be investigated further.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Pilonidal disease in 2022: Where do we stand?
    Abdulraheem, Fawaz
    Boutros, Marylise
    [J]. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (04)
  • [2] Volume of the excised specimen and prediction of surgical site infection in pilonidal sinus procedures (surgical site infection after pilonidal sinus surgery)
    Alptekin, Husnu
    Yilmaz, Huseyin
    Kayis, Seyit Ali
    Sahin, Mustafa
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2013, 43 (12) : 1365 - 1370
  • [3] The impact of experience on recurrence rates after biopsy punch excision for pilonidal disease
    Basso, Luigi
    Pietroletti, Renato
    Micarelli, Alessandro
    Bicaj, Agreta
    Costi, Umberto
    Crocetti, Daniele
    D'Ermo, Giuseppe
    Gallo, Gaetano
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 24 (08) : 984 - 991
  • [4] Cleft-Lift Operation for Pilonidal Sinuses Under Tumescent Local Anesthesia: A Prospective Cohort Study of Peri- and Postoperative Pain
    Bertelsen, Claus Anders
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (07) : 895 - 900
  • [5] Comparison of Short-term Results Between the Modified Karydakis Flap and the Modified Limberg Flap in the Management of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Bessa, Samer S.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (04) : 491 - 498
  • [6] Phenol Injection Versus Excision With Open Healing in Pilonidal Disease: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Calikoglu, Ismail
    Gulpinar, Kamil
    Oztuna, Derya
    Elhan, Atilla Halil
    Dogru, Osman
    Akyol, Cihangir
    Erkek, Bulent
    Kuzu, Mehmet Ayhan
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (02) : 161 - 169
  • [7] Pilonidal sinus disease
    de Parades, V.
    Bouchard, D.
    Janier, M.
    Berger, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2013, 150 (04) : 237 - 247
  • [8] Dubenko D.Y., 2024, Gen Surg, P33
  • [9] Pit excision with phenolisation of the sinus tract versus radical excision in sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: study protocol for a single centre randomized controlled trial
    Furnee, Edgar J. B.
    Davids, Paul H. P.
    Pronk, Apollo
    Smakman, Niels
    [J]. TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [10] German National Guideline on the management of pilonidal disease: update 2020
    Iesalnieks, I.
    Ommer, A.
    Herold, A.
    Doll, D.
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2021, 406 (08) : 2569 - 2580