Prioritizing Sustainable Denim Fabric through Integrated Decision-Making Framework

被引:0
|
作者
Acar, Eda [1 ]
Tama Birkocak, Derya [1 ]
Ozdagoglu, Askin [2 ]
Unal, Zuemruet [1 ]
Ozdemir, Gizem [3 ]
Jose Abreu, Maria [4 ]
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Text Engn Dept, TR-35040 Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Business Fac, Tinaztepe Yerleskesi, TR-35390 Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Uniteks R&D Ctr, Ataturk OSB, 10039 Sk 26, TR-35620 Izmir, Turkiye
[4] Univ Minho, 2C2T Ctr Text Sci & Technol, Campus Azurem, P-4800058 Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
denim fabric; recycled cotton; LMAW; DNMA; MCDM; SELECTION;
D O I
10.3390/ma17133291
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this study, a combined multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach that integrates the logarithm methodology of additive weights (LMAW) and the double normalization-based multiple aggregation (DNMA) methods has been utilized to determine the optimal fabric structures considering the performance characteristics of denim fabrics containing recycled cotton. This approach focuses on sustainability and performance criteria, applying advanced decision-making methodologies to provide in-depth analysis and guidance for denim fabric selection. In this research, 15 distinct criteria were taken into account. Alternatives were ranked based on outcomes obtained from these methods. Although it was not anticipated that the top-ranked alternatives would simultaneously fulfill the beneficial or non-beneficial orientation of all criteria, an examination of the top three alternatives (A12, A5, and A15) for both garment groups revealed that they indeed aligned with the pre-determined criterion orientation. This highlights the effectiveness of the multi-criteria decision-making approach in the context of this study.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Supply chain performance: a novel integrated decision-making model
    Zhong, Jianlan
    Cheng, Han
    Gholami, Hamed
    Letchumanan, L. Thiruvarasu
    Toptanci, Sura
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2023,
  • [42] SDMF: Systematic Decision-making Framework for Evaluation of Software Architecture
    Upadhyay, Nitin
    PROMOTING BUSINESS ANALYTICS AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY: 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT (ITQM 2016), 2016, 91 : 599 - 608
  • [43] A Conceptual Framework to Support Decision-Making in Remanufacturing Engineering Processes
    Alghamdi, Awn
    Prickett, Paul
    Setchi, Rossitza
    SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING 2017, 2017, 68 : 222 - 232
  • [44] An Integrated Decision-Making Model for the Location of a PV Solar Plant
    Lee, Amy H. I.
    Kang, He-Yau
    Lin, Chun-Yu
    Shen, Kuan-Chin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (10) : 13522 - 13541
  • [45] AHP Analyser: A decision-making tool for prioritizing climate change mitigation options and forest management
    Soam, Sudhir Kumar
    Rao, N. Srinivasa
    Yashavanth, B. S.
    Balasani, Raghupathi
    Rakesh, S.
    Marwaha, Sudeep
    Kumar, Prabhat
    Agrawal, R. C.
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [46] Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making
    Wang, Jiang-Jiang
    Jing, You-Yin
    Zhang, Chun-Fa
    Zhao, Jun-Hong
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (09) : 2263 - 2278
  • [47] Prioritizing novel wastewater-to-hydrogen production technologies based on different decision-making approaches
    Adar, Elanur
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2021, 23 (09) : 2615 - 2626
  • [48] An integrated decision-making process for risk analysis of decentralized finance
    Murat Kirişci
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2025, 37 (8) : 6021 - 6051
  • [49] Risk assessment for the integrated energy system using a hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making framework
    Xu, Fangqiu
    Gao, Kaiye
    Xiao, Bowen
    Liu, Jicheng
    Wu, Zixuan
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 7892 - 7907
  • [50] Green supply chain management framework for supplier selection: an integrated multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Ghosh, Sudipta
    Mandal, Madhab Chandra
    Ray, Amitava
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 17 (03) : 205 - 219