RISK-BASED HOOP STRESS FACTORS FOR PRESSURE DESIGN

被引:0
作者
Adianto, Riski [1 ]
Nessim, Maher [1 ]
Ngandu, Balek [1 ]
机构
[1] C FER Technol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 14TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, IPC2022, VOL 1 | 2022年
关键词
risk-based design; pressure design; hoop stress factor; safety class;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
A risk-based pressure design approach has been developed as an alternative to the class location approach currently used in the Canadian Standard Association's (CSA's) Standard Z662. Similar to the current approach, the new approach uses a set of hoop stress factors to calculate the minimum wall thickness from the pressure, diameter, and specified minimum yield strength. The hoop stress factors, termed class factors, are calibrated to keep the failure probability below an allowable value for the limit states representing burst of undamaged pipe under the operating pressure and failure due to equipment impact loading. Yielding under the strength test pressure is addressed as a separate limit on the class factor. To achieve a consistent safety level for all pipelines, the allowable failure probabilities are inversely proportional to the magnitude of failure consequences, as implied by a safety class determined according to the approach described in a companion IPC paper. This paper describes the calibration process used to define the class factors and provides a comparison between the wall thicknesses resulting from the risk-based approach and those obtained from the current hoop stress factors in CSA Z662.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [31] Multi-stakeholder decision-making in the risk-based design of a RO-PAX double bottom for grounding
    Ship Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland
    Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part M J. Eng. Marit. Environ., 2007, 1 (1-15): : 1 - 15
  • [32] Risk-based liquefaction potential evaluation using standard penetration tests
    Juang, CH
    Chen, CJ
    Jiang, T
    Andrus, RD
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 37 (06) : 1195 - 1208
  • [33] Risk Based Design
    Davies, Paul
    Nardo, Marco
    TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE FOR THE SHIPS OF THE FUTURE (NAV 2018), 2018, : 960 - 967
  • [34] Risk-based design and optimization of shape memory alloy restrained sliding bearings for highway bridges under near-fault ground motions
    Pang, Yutao
    He, Wei
    Zhong, Jian
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 241
  • [35] Risk-based optimization of large flood-diversion systems using genetic algorithms
    Afshar, Abbas
    Rasekh, Amin
    Afshar, Mohamad H.
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2009, 41 (03) : 259 - 273
  • [36] Extreme wind load analysis using non-stationary risk-based approach
    Arif M.
    Khan F.
    Ahmed S.
    Imtiaz S.
    Safety in Extreme Environments, 2022, 4 (3): : 247 - 255
  • [37] ONSHORE PIPELINE SAFETY CONSEQUENCE MODELLING IN SUPPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RISK-BASED SAFETY CLASS SYSTEM
    Stephens, Mark
    Yue, Howard
    Halford, Ann
    Foster, Niall
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 14TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, IPC2022, VOL 1, 2022,
  • [38] Risk-based optimization of concentrically braced tall timber buildings: Derivative free optimization algorithm
    Laguardia, Raffaele
    Franchin, Paolo
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2024, 53 (01) : 179 - 199
  • [39] Risk Based Sea Ambulance Design
    Mentes, Ayhan
    Koc, Can Berk
    Ozturk, Deniz
    Bilici, Gurbuz
    Guven, Emre
    Baki, Yagmur
    Kircicegi, Esref
    JOURNAL OF ETA MARITIME SCIENCE, 2019, 7 (01) : 17 - 32
  • [40] Risk-Based Analysis of Electro-Explosive Devices Switching System: A Case Study of Aerospace System
    Kumar, Mukesh
    Kamalakar, G.
    Rao, S. Giridhar
    RELIABILITY, SAFETY AND HAZARD ASSESSMENT FOR RISK-BASED TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, : 941 - 956