Economic feasibility assessment of coal-biomass co-firing power generation technology

被引:6
作者
Zhang, Yun-Long [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Lan-Cui [4 ]
Kang, Jia-Ning [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Peng, Song [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mi, Zhifu [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Liao, Hua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wei, Yi-Ming [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Key Lab Energy Econ & Environm Management, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Business Sch, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[5] UCL, Bartlett Sch Construct & Project Management, London WC1E 6BT, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Coal-fired power; Biomass co -firing technology; Break-even price; Techno-economics; Scenario analysis; Indirect benefits; China; CO2; reduction; Emission quota; LCA; TECHNOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT; EMISSIONS; POLICIES; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2024.131092
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Biomass co-firing technology is a potential solution for low-carbon transition of coal-fired power plants. Existing techno-economic analyses of this technology fail to consider indirect benefits, such as avoided losses from technology retrofitting, and the heterogeneity across regions. To address these limitations, we developed five types of techno-economic indicators to analyze six possible future scenarios for the application of this technology in 29 provinces of China, based on regional heterogeneous data. The results show, first, generally, the higher the local coal price, the local on-grid electricity price, the biomass feed-in tariff subsidy, and the carbon trading price, the greater the incentives and benefits for biomass co-firing. Second, bio-electricity tariff subsidies greatly increase the incentives for technology retrofitting, with 26 of the 29 provinces analyzed having sufficient incentives for retrofits in this scenario. Third, biomass co-firing technology has more revenue potential when emission quota is limited than when it's not. Our results indicate that a timely tightening of the CO2 emission quotas of the coal power sector will stimulate technological retrofits even without additional policy incentives, while more plants retrofitted will achieve positive returns with additional incentives.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Economics of co-firing rice straw in coal power plants in Vietnam
    An Ha Truong
    Minh Ha-Duong
    Hoang Anh Tran
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 154
  • [2] The effects of biomass co-gasification and co-firing on the development of combustion dynamics
    Barmina, Inesa
    Valdmanis, Raimonds
    Zake, Maija
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 146 : 4 - 12
  • [3] Technoeconomic assessment of beetle kill biomass co-firing in existing coal fired power plants in the Western United States
    Beagle, E.
    Belmont, E.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 97 : 429 - 438
  • [4] Biomass for electricity in the EU-27: Potential demand, CO2 abatements and breakeven prices for co-firing
    Bertrand, Vincent
    Dequiedt, Benjamin
    Le Cadre, Elodie
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 73 : 631 - 644
  • [5] Chang J, 2019, Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, V35, DOI [10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.05.028, DOI 10.11975/J.ISSN.1002-6819.2019.05.028]
  • [6] Pathway toward carbon-neutral electrical systems in China by mid-century with negative CO2 abatement costs informed by high-resolution modeling
    Chen, Xinyu
    Liu, Yaxing
    Wang, Qin
    Lv, Jiajun
    Wen, Jinyu
    Chen, Xia
    Kang, Chongqing
    Cheng, Shijie
    McElroy, Michael B.
    [J]. JOULE, 2021, 5 (10) : 2715 - 2741
  • [7] China Electricity Council, 2021, China Electric Power Statistical Yearbook
  • [8] A techno-economic assessment of biomass co-firing in Czech Republic, France, Germany and Poland
    Cutz, Luis
    Berndes, Goran
    Johnsson, Filip
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2019, 13 (05): : 1289 - 1305
  • [9] Drivers of biomass co-firing in US coal-fired power plants
    Goerndt, Michael E.
    Aguilar, Francisco X.
    Skog, Kenneth
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 58 : 158 - 167
  • [10] Gowen D, 2019, Task 32-biomass combustion and cofiring-triennium 2016-2018