Sex and gender differences in upper extremity prosthesis rejection: A review of literature

被引:1
作者
Henderson, Eric [1 ]
Rehani, Mayank [1 ]
Hebert, Jacqueline S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, Div Phys Med & Rehabil, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Katz Grp Ctr Pharm & Hlth Res 5 005, Dept Med, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada
关键词
sex differences; gender differences; upper extremity; amputation; prosthesis rejection; LIMB AMPUTATION; REHABILITATION; INDIVIDUALS; VETERANS; USAGE;
D O I
10.1097/PXR.0000000000000330
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Prosthesis rejection is a significant barrier to rehabilitation of persons with upper limb difference. Many individual factors can affect device rejection, including a person's sex or gender. The objective of this narrative review was to explore the reported differences between the sexes and genders in upper limb prosthesis rejection. This review considered peer-reviewed, published research studies in which the study population were adults (aged 18 and older) who had unilateral or bilateral limb difference (any level) of any etiology with current, past, or no history of prosthetic device usage. Using identified keywords, index terms, and a peer-reviewed search filter, the literature was searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycInfo. The reasons for rejection, disuse, or abandonment of prosthetic devices were extracted, with the focus on reported differences between sex and genders. After searching, 29 articles were selected for full-text review and 15 were included. Only 5 of 15 articles examined differences between the sexes. Women tend to reject upper extremity prostheses more than men both before and after being fit with a device; device characteristics, such as weight and cosmesis, do not appear to be appropriately designed for women; and there may not be adequate consideration of the goals for women with limb difference(s). There is inadequate reporting of sex and gender in the literature on prosthesis rejection; future studies should report and explore these factors to determine whether the needs of the full population with limb loss are being met.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 314
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], Covidence systematic review software
  • [2] The roles of predisposing characteristics, established need, and enabling resources on upper extremity prosthesis use and abandonment
    Biddiss, Elaine
    Chau, Tom
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 2 (02) : 71 - 84
  • [3] Upper-limb prosthetics - Critical factors in device abandonment
    Biddiss, Elaine
    Chau, Tom
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2007, 86 (12) : 977 - 987
  • [4] Implications of prosthesis funding structures on the use of prostheses: experiences of individuals with upper limb absence
    Biddiss, Elaine
    McKeever, Patricia
    Lindsay, Sally
    Chau, Tom
    [J]. PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 35 (02) : 215 - 224
  • [5] Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years
    Biddiss, Elaine A.
    Chau, Tom T.
    [J]. PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 31 (03) : 236 - 257
  • [6] Multivariate prediction of upper limb prosthesis acceptance or rejection
    Biddiss, Elaine A.
    Chau, Tom T.
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 3 (04) : 181 - 192
  • [7] Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Gender and Health Online Training Modules: Integrating Sex and Gender in Health Research
  • [8] Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees
    Dudkiewicz, I
    Gabrielov, R
    Seiv-Ner, I
    Zelig, G
    Heim, M
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 26 (01): : 60 - 63
  • [9] Preferences for rehabilitation services among women with major limb amputations
    Elnitsky, Christine A.
    Latlief, Gail A.
    Andrews, Erin E.
    Adams-Koss, Laurel B.
    Phillips, Samuel L.
    [J]. REHABILITATION NURSING, 2013, 38 (01) : 32 - 36
  • [10] Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use
    Shirin Heidari
    Thomas F. Babor
    Paola De Castro
    Sera Tort
    Mirjam Curno
    [J]. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1 (1)