Applying life cycle assessment to investigate the environmental impacts of a PV-CSP hybrid system

被引:7
作者
Qi, Xiaoyan [1 ]
Yao, Xilong [1 ]
Guo, Pibin [1 ,2 ]
Han, Yunfei [1 ]
Liu, Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Taiyuan Univ Technol, Coll Econ & Management, Taiyuan 030024, Peoples R China
[2] Shanxi Inst Econ Management, Dept Econ & Management, Taiyuan 030024, Peoples R China
关键词
Photovoltaic; Concentrated solar power; Life cycle assessment; Environmental impacts; SOLAR POWER-PLANT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM; ENERGY; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2024.120575
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Photovoltaic and concentrated solar power (PV-CSP) hybrid systems have effectively solved the issues with the volatility and energy storage costs of PV electricity generation, and they have the potential to replace PV generation. However, the environmental impacts of PV-CSP have not been reported in the literature. In this research, a life cycle assessment method was adopted to investigate the potential environmental impacts of the PV-CSP hybrid system. The results showed that throughout the life cycle, the manufacturing stage had the largest adverse impact on the energy conservation and emission reduction targets of China's 13th Five -Year Plan (ECER135), whereas the decommissioning stage significantly alleviated the environment burden through the recovery of main materials. Compared to standalone PV or CSP, the PV-CSP hybrid system exhibited significant comparative advantages, with carbon emissions and greenhouse gas emissions measuring 42 g CO 2 and 45.92 g CO 2 eq, respectively. During the manufacturing stage, PV modules, PV balance of system, solar field, and thermal energy storage system contributed significantly to the environmental impact. The sensitivities of different inventory materials in environmental indicators were different, and the same material had different sensitivities in different subsystems or stages.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Solar power technology for electricity generation: A critical review [J].
Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossein ;
Ghazvini, Mahyar ;
Sadeghzadeh, Milad ;
Nazari, Mohammad Alhuyi ;
Kumar, Ravinder ;
Naeimi, Abbas ;
Ming, Tingzhen .
ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2018, 6 (05) :340-361
[2]   Comprehensive techno-economic and environmental impact study of a localised photovoltaic power system (PPS) for off-grid communities [J].
Akinyele, Daniel O. ;
Rayudu, Ramesh K. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 124 :266-279
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO14040 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Renewable Capacity Statistics 2022"
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment Requirements and Guidelines, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.332.7555.1418,1418.1
[6]  
B.P. Plc, 2021, BP Energy Outlook, V70, P8
[7]   Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of a dish-Stirling Concentrating Solar Power Plant in the Mediterranean area [J].
Backes, J. G. ;
D'Amico, A. ;
Pauliks, N. ;
Guarino, S. ;
Traverso, M. ;
Lo Brano, V. .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2021, 47
[8]  
CEC, 2022, China Electric Power Statistical Yearbook 2022, Vfirst
[9]   The quantification of the embodied impacts of construction projects on energy, environment, and society based on I-O LCA [J].
Chang, Yuan ;
Ries, Robert J. ;
Wang, Yaowu .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (10) :6321-6330
[10]   Nonrenewable energy cost and greenhouse gas emissions of a 1.5 MW solar power tower plant in China [J].
Chen, G. Q. ;
Yang, Q. ;
Zhao, Y. H. ;
Wang, Z. F. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (04) :1961-1967