Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review with Network MetaAnalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:0
作者
Wu, Yingjie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shen, Ruoqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Shengke [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Ting [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rong, Limin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Liangming [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Spine Surg, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Prov Ctr Qual Control Minimally Invas Sp, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Prov Ctr Engn & Technol Res Minimally In, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Fusion surgery; Lumbar spondylolisthesis; spondylolisthesis Network meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trials; Systematic review; POSTEROLATERAL INSTRUMENTED FUSION; ADULT ISTHMIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INTERBODY-FUSION; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SAGITTAL ALIGNMENT; LEARNING-CURVE; SPINAL-FUSION; TLIF; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/J.WNEU.2024.02.051
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
- OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the optimal surgical fusion approach for lumbar spondylolisthesis, to provide the latest and most reliable evidence for future clinical practice. - METHODS: A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Ovid-Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases was conducted from inception to September 1, 2023, to identify relevant records. Two independent reviewers performed the literature screening, data extraction, and assessment of study quality. - RESULTS: Fifteen randomized controlled trials involving 892 patients met the inclusion criteria. The network evidence plot showed that posterolateral fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) were the most used fusion techn iques. The network meta -analysis results revealed that minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) had a significantly greater improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) compared to endoscopicTLIF, while PLIF had a significantly better fusion effect than posterolateral fusion. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences were observed between other fusion surgeries in terms of improving ODI, fusion rate, complications, or the improvement of visual analog scale -low back pain. The surface u nder the cumulative ranking curve results indicated that MIS-TLIF had the greatest potential for improving ODI, visual analog scale -low back pain, and complications, while PLIF had the greatest potential for increasing fusion rates. However, the existing selection bias, measurement bias, reporting bias, and publication bias may have reduced the reliability of the meta -analysis results. - CONCLUSIONS: Among the various fusion surgeries for lumbar spondylolisthesis, MIS-TLIF appears to provide the greatest benefit to patients. However, more high -quality, large-scale studies are needed to further investigate the treatment efficacy of different fusion surgeries for lumbar spondylolisthesis.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [31] Posterolateral lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis
    Li, Fang-cai
    Chen, Qi-xin
    Chen, Wei-shan
    Xu, Kan
    Wu, Qiong-hua
    Chen, Gang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (09) : 1241 - 1245
  • [32] Total 3D Airo® Navigation for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lian, Xiaofeng
    Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo
    Berlin, Connor
    Jada, Ajit
    Moriguchi, Yu
    Zhang, Qiwei
    Hartl, Roger
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [33] What is the Optimum Fusion Technique for Adult Spondylolisthesis-PLIF or PLF or PLIF Plus PLF? A Meta-analysis From 17 Comparative Studies
    Liu, Xiao-Yang
    Qiu, Gui-Xing
    Weng, Xi-Sheng
    Yu, Bin
    Wang, Yi-Peng
    [J]. SPINE, 2014, 39 (22) : 1887 - 1898
  • [34] Comparison of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion for the Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
    Luo, Jiaquan
    Cao, Kai
    Yu, Ting
    Li, Liangping
    Huang, Sheng
    Gong, Ming
    Cao, Cong
    Zou, Xuenong
    [J]. CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (07): : E915 - E922
  • [35] Endo-TLIF versus MIS-TLIF in 1-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis: A prospective randomized pilot study
    Lv, You
    Chen, Ming
    Wang, Shou-Lin
    Qin, Ru-Jie
    Ma, Cheng
    Ding, Qi-Rui
    Qin, Hao-Nan
    Wang, Xiang-Fu
    Ren, Yong-Xin
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 212
  • [36] Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis
    Madan, S
    Boeree, NR
    [J]. SPINE, 2002, 27 (14) : 1536 - 1542
  • [37] Critical analysis of trends in lumbar fusion for degenerative disorders revisited: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcomes
    Makanji, Heeren
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Bhalla, Amandeep
    Bono, Christopher M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (08) : 1868 - 1876
  • [38] Minimally invasive surgery compared to open spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    Sivabalan, Praveenan
    Li, Jane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (06) : 829 - 835
  • [39] Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
    Moher, David
    Liberati, Alessandro
    Tetzlaff, Jennifer
    Altman, Douglas G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (10) : 1006 - 1012
  • [40] Intramuscular pressure of the multifidus muscle and low-back pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of mini-open and conventional approaches
    Mukai, Yoshihiro
    Takenaka, Shota
    Hosono, Noboru
    Miwa, Toshitada
    Fuji, Takeshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 19 (06) : 651 - 657