Avoidance and attraction responses of kittiwakes to three offshore wind farms in the North Sea

被引:0
作者
Pollock, Christopher J. [1 ,2 ]
Johnston, Daniel T. [1 ]
Boersch-Supan, Philipp H. [3 ]
Thaxter, Chris B. [3 ]
Humphreys, Elizabeth M. [1 ]
O'Hanlon, Nina J. [1 ]
Clewley, Gary D. [1 ]
Weston, Ewan D. [4 ]
Shamoun-Baranes, Judy [5 ]
Cook, Aonghais S. C. P. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Stirling Univ, Beta Ctr, Unit 15, British Trust Ornithol Scotland, Innovat Pk, Stirling FK9 4NF, Scotland
[2] UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Bush Estate, Penicuik EH26 0QB, Scotland
[3] British Trust Ornithol, Thetford IP24 2PU, England
[4] Comers Wood Croft, Midmar AB51 7QB, Scotland
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Biodivers & Ecosyst Dynam, NL-1090 GE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Biodivers Consultancy, 3E Kings Parade, Cambridge CB2 1SJ, England
关键词
Kittiwake; Rissa tridactyla; Avoidance; Attraction; Collision-risk modelling; Offshore wind farm; AVIAN COLLISION RISK; BLACK-BACKED GULLS; IMPACTS; SEABIRDS; VULNERABILITY; BARRIERS; TRACKING;
D O I
10.1007/s00227-024-04542-y
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Seabird collision risk is a key concern in relation to the environmental impacts associated with offshore wind farms (OWFs). Understanding how species respond both to the wind farm itself, and individual turbines within the wind farm, is key to enabling better quantification and management of collision risk. Collision risk is of particular concern for the black-legged kittiwake, Rissa tridactyla, where modelling predicts unsustainable population level impacts. In this study 20 adult breeding kittiwakes, were tracked with GPS from Whinnyfold, Scotland (57 degrees 23 ' 07 '' N, 001 degrees 52 ' 11 '' W) during the breeding season in 2021. An Avoidance-Attraction Index (AAI) was estimated at several bands within macro- and meso-scales (0-4 km from outer boundary and 0-400 m from turbines, respectively), and the Avoidance Rate (AR; used in environmental impact assessments) at macro-scale to estimate avoidance behaviour to three operational OWFs within their foraging range. One offshore wind farm and its buffer zone (0-4 km from outer boundary) was visited more frequently by the majority of tracked individuals (19/20 birds), despite being twice as far as the closest OWF (17.3 and 31.9 km respectively), whilst 10 or less individuals used the remaining two OWFs. At the most frequented OWF we found macro-scale attraction to the closest band (0-1 km) trending towards avoidance in the furthest band (3-4 km). At the meso-scale we found avoidance of areas below the rotor height range (RHR, a.k.a. rotor swept area/zone) up to 120 m from individual turbines, which decreased to 60 m when within the RHR. Our results indicate that kittiwakes may be slightly attracted to the area around OWFs or aggregate here due to displacement but avoid individual turbines. Increased productivity in the OWF area may potentially be drawing birds into the general area, with aversion to individual turbines being responsible for meso-scale observations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [31] Centralized Offshore Hydrogen Production from Wind Farms in the Baltic Sea Area-A Study Case for Poland
    Ligeza, Klaudia
    Laciak, Mariusz
    Ligeza, Bartlomiej
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (17)
  • [32] Assessment of Five Wind-Farm Parameterizations in the Weather Research and Forecasting Model: A Case Study of Wind Farms in the North Sea
    Ali, Karim
    Schultz, David M.
    Revell, Alistair
    Stallard, Timothy
    Ouro, Pablo
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2023, 151 (09) : 2333 - 2359
  • [33] Three-dimensional tracking of a wide-ranging marine predator: flight heights and vulnerability to offshore wind farms
    Cleasby, Ian R.
    Wakefield, Ewan D.
    Bearhop, Stuart
    Bodey, Thomas W.
    Votier, Stephen C.
    Hamer, Keith C.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2015, 52 (06) : 1474 - 1482
  • [34] The large-scale impact of offshore wind farm structures on pelagic primary productivity in the southern North Sea
    Kaela Slavik
    Carsten Lemmen
    Wenyan Zhang
    Onur Kerimoglu
    Knut Klingbeil
    Kai W. Wirtz
    Hydrobiologia, 2019, 845 : 35 - 53
  • [35] The large-scale impact of offshore wind farm structures on pelagic primary productivity in the southern North Sea
    Slavik, Kaela
    Lemmen, Carsten
    Zhang, Wenyan
    Kerimoglu, Onur
    Klingbeil, Knut
    Wirtz, Kai W.
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2019, 845 (01) : 35 - 53
  • [36] Determining suitable container ports for offshore wind farms based on geographical information system-analytic hierarchy process: a case study of Marmara Sea
    Samet Öztürk
    Fatih Karipoğlu
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15 (1)
  • [37] Fault-Tolerant Three-Vector Model-Predictive-Control-Based Grid-Connected Control Strategy for Offshore Wind Farms
    Wu, Jiahui
    Li, Jiangyong
    Wang, Haiyun
    Li, Guodong
    Ru, Yalun
    ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (12)
  • [38] Consequences of a cumulative perspective on marine environmental impacts: Offshore wind farming and seabirds at North Sea scale in context of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive
    Busch, Malte
    Kannen, Andreas
    Garthe, Stefan
    Jessopp, Mark
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 71 : 213 - 224
  • [39] Mobile demersal megafauna at common offshore wind turbine foundations in the German Bight (North Sea) two years after deployment - increased production rate of Cancer pagurus
    Krone, R.
    Dederer, G.
    Kanstinger, P.
    Kraemer, P.
    Schneider, C.
    Schmalenbach, I.
    MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2017, 123 : 53 - 61