Influencing factors and the establishment of a basin ecological compensation mechanism from the perspective of water conservation: A case study of the upper Yangtze River in China

被引:15
作者
Guan, Dongjie [1 ]
Chen, Shi [1 ]
Zhang, Yuxiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Zhifeng [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Peng, Guochuan [2 ,6 ]
Zhou, Lilei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Smart City, 66 Xuefu Rd, Chongqing 400074, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Acad Social Sci, Res Ctr Ecol Secur & Green Dev, Chongqing 400020, Peoples R China
[3] China Geol Survey, Appl Geol Res Ctr, Chengdu 610036, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol E, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Sch Nat Resources, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[6] Chongqing Acad Social Sci, Inst Ecol & Environm Resources, Chongqing 400020, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecological compensation threshold; Land use conversion; Water conservation; Optimal parameters-based geographical detec; tor; Upper Yangtze River basin; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142332
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the dual impacts of global environmental degradation and human activities, ecosystem service functions have steadily declined. Ecological compensation has emerged as an important direct and efficient motivator for countries to implement ecosystem protection and restoration. At present, few studies have considered ways in which to establish ecological compensation mechanisms or have analyze the related influencing factors. The ecological compensation threshold is in the conceptual analysis stage; thus, quantitative simulation studies are lacking. In this study, the relationship between water conservation and ecological compensation was analyzed. Scenario simulation and the minimum data method were combined to establish an ecological compensation mechanism for the upper Yangtze River (UYR) basin, and the ecological compensation thresholds were quantitatively assessed. Finally, the factors influencing ecological compensation and the interactions among the factors were analyzed using an optimal parameters-based geographical detector. The results showed that (1) the different land use scenarios for the UYR resulted in notable water conservation differences, with greater differences under the fallow-to-forest scenario than under the fallow-to-grass scenario and existing scenario. (2) Furthermore, 27 subbasins were suitable for the implementation of the fallow-to-forest scenario, with an average ecological compensation threshold of 46.48 yuan/m3 and an average new water conservation amount of 22.02 x 108 m3; and 21 subbasins were suitable for the implementation of the fallow-to-grass scenario, with an average ecological compensation threshold of 107.87 yuan/m3 and an average new water conservation amount of 3.72 x 108 m3. (3) The drivers with the highest and lowest impacts on the ecological compensation thresholds were the grain yield and NDVI, respectively, while their impacts on ecological compensation were significantly enhanced by interactions among the influencing factors. In this study, the differences in ecological compensation standards were compared at the basin scale and administrative scale in different regions worldwide. Moreover, the need to establish a basin-scale ecological compensation mechanism as an effective reference for promoting the implementation and development of ecological compensation policies was explored.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 66 条
[21]   Cross-regional ecological compensation under the composite index of water quality and quantity: A case study of the Yellow River Basin [J].
Hu, Hao ;
Tian, Guiliang ;
Wu, Zheng ;
Xia, Qing .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 238
[22]   A study of ecological compensation from the perspective of land use/cover change in the middle and lower Yellow River, China [J].
Hu, Hao ;
Tian, Guiliang ;
Wu, Zheng ;
Xia, Qing .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 143
[23]   China's ecological civilization program-Implementing ecological redline policy [J].
Jiang, Bo ;
Bai, Yang ;
Wong, Christina P. ;
Xu, Xibao ;
Alatalo, Juha M. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 81 :111-114
[24]   Quantification of the coupling relationship between ecological compensation and ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China [J].
Jiang, Yanan ;
Guan, Dongjie ;
He, Xiujuan ;
Yin, Boling ;
Zhou, Lilei ;
Sun, Lingli ;
Huang, Danan ;
Li, Zihui ;
Zhang, Yanjun .
LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 114
[25]   The environmental - social interface of sustainable development capabilities, social capital, institutions [J].
Lehtonen, M .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 49 (02) :199-214
[26]   Current status of ecological compensation for Bohai Sea reclamation and management countermeasures [J].
Li, Wei ;
Yue, Qi ;
Hu, Heng ;
Liu, Liang .
MARINE POLICY, 2023, 155
[27]   Spatiotemporal trends in ecosystem carbon stock evolution and quantitative attribution in a karst watershed in southwest China [J].
Li, Yue ;
Geng, Huacai .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 153
[28]   Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Water Conservation Function and Its Driving Factors in the Upper Yangtze River Basin [J].
Liu, Chengjian ;
Zou, Lei ;
Xia, Jun ;
Chen, Xinchi ;
Zuo, Lingfeng ;
Yu, Jiarui .
REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (21)
[29]   Estimate provincial-level effectiveness of the arable land requisition-compensation balance policy in mainland China in the last 20 years [J].
Liu, Chenyu ;
Song, Changqing ;
Ye, Sijing ;
Cheng, Feng ;
Zhang, Leina ;
Li, Chao .
LAND USE POLICY, 2023, 131
[30]   Allocating payments for ecosystem services under future multiple scenarios in the Yellow River Basin, China [J].
Liu, Ying ;
Qu, Bo ;
Jiang, Enhui ;
Hao, Lingang ;
Zhu, Yongwei ;
Jing, Yongcai .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 157