Update on using buccal myomucosal flaps for patients with cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency: primary and secondary interventions

Purpose of reviewThis review aims to examine the indications and anatomical circumstances for when to optimally incorporate buccal myomucosal flaps (BMFs) into palatal surgical reconstruction.Recent findingsStudies examining outcomes following primary cleft palate repair with incorporation of BMF have demonstrated excellent speech outcomes and low rates of fistula. Furthermore, some reports cite an association of buccal flap use with reduced midface hypoplasia and the need for later orthognathic surgery. When used for secondary speech surgery, BMFs have been shown to lead to speech improvements across multiple outcome measures. Advantages of BMF techniques over conventionally described pharyngeal flap and pharyngoplasty procedures include significant lengthening of the velum, favorable repositioning of the levator muscular sling, and lower rates of obstructive sleep apnea.SummaryAlthough the published data demonstrate excellent outcomes with use of BMFs for primary and secondary palatal surgery, there are limited data to conclude superiority over the traditional, more extensively investigated surgical techniques. The authors of this review agree with the evidence that BMF techniques can be useful in primary palatoplasty for congenitally wide clefts, secondary speech surgery for large velopharyngeal gaps, and/or in individuals with a predisposition for airway obstruction from traditional approaches.